Cyber A

..sehr beliebt zu sein scheinen. Die zwei Bücher die ich suche scheinen sehr beleibt zu sein daher gibt’s die bei den Amazone gebrauchten Büchern für etwa den 8-10 fachen Preis des Neubuches. Gibt’s sowas wie kostenpflichtigen Büchernachdruck oder gibt’s ein Shop der ausgelaufene Bücher als ebook anbietet oder irgendeine andre alternative die euch einfällt?!

Ps: es handelt sich um folgende Bücher:

*Der Drache in meiner Garage oder Die Kunst der Wissenschaft, Unsinn zu entlarven

(Carl Sagan )

* Krieg der Spermien (Robin Baker)

Wunder erschließen sich letztlich nur dem, der bereit ist, eine übernatürliche Ursache zu akzeptieren. Für einen reinen Materialisten, der nicht nur Gott, sondern jede nicht-materielle Existenz ablehnt, sind Wunder zwar auch überprüfbar. Er wird aber nur zu dem Schluss kommen, dass es sich bei den beschriebenen Phänomen um nicht erklärbare Ereignisse handelt.

Erst der religiöse Kontext - die Bedeutung für den, der Glauben will oder eine Stärkung seines Glaubens erfährt - lässt das unerklärliche Ereignis zu einem Wunder werden.

Ok I tried I few things like the online tool

overstream and Subtitle Workshop but till know I haven’t found a tool witch I am satisfied with.

Any suggestions?

Gibt es irgendein verfahren was uns vor der Vorratsdatenspeicherung schützen kann?

Off course everything could be explained by an innerving designing God.

But the Question is "why" you want to believe this if we got plenty of evidence that offers a much simpler explanation ?

Each Scientific theory has to be falsifiable or it is not science.

This is one of the honest and emotional videos I ever saw from a atheist.If you got the time watch it and tell me your opinion

http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd7FSZ9vgIs

Hallo meine Freundin hat sich als Lektorin beworben und hat nun eine Aufforderung erhalten einen Text Inhaltlich, stilistisch und formal (in 3 Stunden) zu bearbeiten. 6 Seiten plus kurze Schlussfolgerungen aus der Textprobe. Gibt es hier für irgendwelche Tipps, links ?

Außerdem soll sie ein Scan ihrer Textkorrektur einschicken, SCAN ?

Danke für die Hilfe

Gruß Cyber

I don’t that it is child abuse but I think that the effects of it can be as harmful.

We should teach our kids what is useful to their lives, the basics. There is a reason why we don’t teach philosophy or Politics in preschool so why teach religious believes at that time?

Lately I was talking with a Christian that told me that he have no problem with evolution because the Hebrew bible supports the idea of an old earth, is that correct?

Faith in a higher being is as old as humanity itself. But what sparked the Divine Idea? Did our earliest ancestors gain some evolutionary advantage through their shared religious feelings? In these extracts from his latest book, Robert Winston ponders the biggest question of them all...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/oct/13/religi...

What do you think about this article and why ?

I am not interested in easy answer like they believe in literally truth of Genesis.

I want to know why some believers fear Evolution Science and blame it to be an invention of the atheist. When in the same moment believers of the same religion have no emotional struggle with evolution.

Why thinks one believer that if this theory is the true’s his picture of the world falls apart when the other believer of the same religion can include this scientific findings without a problem.

What is the difference between those two emotionally, rationally and in there world view.

The Universe consists of matter, time and space.

Einstein showed than time and space are of the same thing (spacetime) and he also showed that matter is a manifestation of energy.

Energy can be converted to Matter and vice verse.

So space-time has to have a beginning at the big bang or as a believer will argue as god created the universe. But it’s different with matter as a manifestation of energy.

So here is the kicker question did energy have a beginning?

Does energy need time and space to exist?

For everything to have a cause energy is needed. All cause effect relationships transfer energy from one thing to another. So for everything to have a beginning including matter, time and space there have to be energy present. So all energy that exists now must had existed at the beginning. Because the first law of thermodynamics stated that energy can’t be crated or destroyed. So energy must has always been here. Now the question out of this conclusions is....

The Universe consists of matter, time and space.

Einstein showed than time and space are of the same thing (spacetime) and he also showed that matter is a manifestation of energy.

Energy can be converted to Matter and vice verse.

So space-time has to have a beginning at the big bang or as a believer will argue as god created the universe. But it’s different with matter as a manifestation of energy.

So here is the kicker question did energy have a beginning?

Does energy need time and space to exist?

For everything to have a cause energy is needed. All cause effect relationships transfer energy from one thing to another. (Fundamental law of physics). So for everything to have a beginning including matter, time and space there have to be energy present. So all energy that exists now must had existed at the beginning. Because the first law of thermodynamics stated that energy can’t be crated or destroyed. So energy must has always been here. Now the question out of this conclusions is.

Ich habe mich gerade gefragt wie viele von euch mit ihm in die gleiche Kerbe schlagen würden, wie viele einfach nix sagen würden und wie viele ihre Stimme gegen ihren Glaubensbruder erheben würden ?

Go watch it and came back and tell me if you converted follower of Justnowism

http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=sCy48nOwi6g

I would say NO because the overwhelming majority of the scientific community believes its claims to be false, its defenders have not shown that their theory can account for any of the data evolution accounts for, and they have not provided any reason for believing that their theory even has the potential to produce anything useful to science. If ID believers try to apply different standards in deciding what should get taught in science classes, I invite him to tell me what those standards are.

I was just wondering if you will defend that the atheist can be moral too or if you will join the other theist in some verbal atheist smashing?