Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.
I have suggestion to evolutionist & also creationist in connection with presence of vestigial organ?
It is possible have vestigial organ with creationist theory also:-
I want explain this with example, MS Word means Microsoft software & also notepad again Microsoft software
I make first document in MS word WITHOUT any formatting & second document in MS word with very good formatting.
I do this because I think MS Word is best option for me then notepad where much formatting is not allowed. Space in my hard disk is not problem for me
now in first case if you say that there is much vestigial thing & this is only necessary in second case so first document has evolved from second document. This is not correct because I am creator. So vestigial organ do not necessarily confirm evolution with out creator (intelligent desigin) it only says what tools creator (tools may be improved with time) used while making species. This same principle is seen even in electronic gadgets of today.
Probably this did not come to mind of Darwin as in those days in every day life as there were no common tools to do different jobs which are apparently disconnected. So he said unless creator had plan to mislead us there should not be any vestigial organ
My postulation is, when one makes different complicated structures, He or she will make some common tools, which are useful in making similar functions, in different structures; hence there is tendency for vestigenicity, by virtue of common tool being used.
So Vestigenicity does not preclude possibility of creator or intelligent design
I don not say that, there is no relationship between different species. I just say there is intelligent design which/who dictates natural selection & other mechanism of evolution. & vestigial organ as understood are not misleaders for creationist theory. Probably further vestigial organ can used find out what common tools intelligent designer is using for evolution so intelligent designer part evolut
I am putting this question in different section to no the response & I should say that my mother tongue is not English
I am putting this question in different section to know the response & I should say that my mother tongue is not English
Now compares ion of software & evolution has created lot of misunderstanding’s want reply this to you all
When god is creator he dealt all species as his machines & as though we treated our machines. Now as there is vestigenosity in our machine by virtue of our technology, why don’t we accept the same vestigenosity by his technology.
I quoted above word document because I thought any body on internet will easily understand about word document I have mentioned about this short vestigenosity seen in our electronic gadgets
I meen look at one Chip which has been made do many functions… To do many function there has to be some amount of structural changes made in chip to do multiple functions .in such case, if in one machine only part of it useful than there is vestigenosity in that machine by that chip as only part of it is being used
5 Antworten
- ?Lv 7vor 1 JahrzehntBeste Antwort
Your point is thought provoking. Evolution can not be compared to two documents on desktop. Because MS Word 1st dcument may be similar to the 2nd document but a copy or shortcut of the 1st document taken billion times don`t change in content or format. So there is nothing vestigeal about it. Both documents are created by the you(creator) using the same tools and there is not even a minimum change during replication.
Vestigeal quality is not confined to structure or just the make (of format). Vestigeal "movements" and "functions" also exist in animals and humans. HUMANS SWING THEIR ARMS WHILE WALKING WITH LEGS. This is the functional vestige of moving fore legs and hind legs together while walking . It can be easily seen we move right hand forward when we move left leg while walking. much like a quadruped.
Certain biochemical values gradually change from lower animals to higher animals .Blood glucose of quadrupeds is less than apes. Blood glucose of apes is less than that of humans. These values are related to heredity, diet(food habits),and exercise
Please think over and contact me for discussion if you please
.
- Anonymvor 5 Jahren
There is really no such thing as vestigial organs. It is just a term applied to some body parts that scientist do not understand the purpose of. All doctors/scientist do not believe that some organs are vestigial. Yes there parts of our bodies that can be removed without serious harm, but that does not mean they are useless.
- GnomonLv 6vor 1 Jahrzehnt
I've a feeling that God would be better able to write English than you. If you want to develop your theory you should:
1. write it in proper English
2. write it in the correct place (not Astronomy and Space)
3. see can you use your explanation to prove anything - can it prove that Evolution is wrong, or that Creationism is right?
- jhsthaLv 4vor 1 Jahrzehnt
You must be a complete fool, for it isn't comprehensible at all what you want; besides, your "question" does N O T belong to astronomy and space.
And your "question" isn't a question after all, neither by its grammar nor by its content !!
- Wie finden Sie die Antworten? Melden Sie sich an, um über die Antwort abzustimmen.
- vor 1 Jahrzehnt
interesting, however....these creationists think the world is only 10,000 years old