occluderx

Given what this posting says:

http://www.militarytimes.com/forum/showpost.php?p=...

(I) am the author.

If you need a reference to 'empty' space you can read it at the blog

http://ca.360.yahoo.com/mr.robinparsons

Recent postings

(I) suppose this is really a question for the evolutionists, a religious-physics-metaphysics question.

BTW my knowledge tells me that that is the infinite (What is know-able as 'Empty' space) and that, that 'infinite' is God or Creator as that is from whence this Seemingly occupied or, full space, comes from, evolves from.

(Occupied or full space includes perceivable 'outer' space {The Universe} as, even thought that looks 'empty' - it is not, there is energy there, and the 'Particle Planck' - too!)

Is this a good question? to make it go away simply report it as abuse.

This link:

http://www.militarytimes.com/forum/showthread.php?...

(I) am the Author.

If you are posting 'works' written works, on the internet, under either a 'psudeonym-psudeoname' or "Avatar" do you, should you still have full Moral Authorial Rights?

If Yes, how would/should damages in a courtroom be assessed?

If No, then why?

Here at this site physicsmathforums(dot)com (link below) is a writting by Epsilon=One that claims to be a "Proof of God"

http://physicsmathforums.com/showpost.php?p=319&po...

My Questions are,

#1) How much of the information on this page is actually relevant to proving what is asserted-claimed as proven?

#2) Do you think that the Avatar/psudeo-author proved what they claim to have proven?

This is costing me Five points so please it is a long (Boring) read so venture at your own risk, and answer only if you bother to read all of it.

Thanks

When Mr. George Bush recently passed a law concerning Torture, he had it backdated to back when the actual tortures started, back near enough the 09/11/01 date so, when he was taking the "Oath of Office" (Swearing to uphold the Law and the Virtue of the Law) if he knew about those tortures, he was an "accessory after the fact" to them, ergo He would have known he had committed Crime(s), (just not tried yet) so is it a 'given' that when he took his Oath, he was lying, and therefore committed a crime/criminal offense?

One of the Few Places in Life where Lying can get you in trouble with the law, that/there, and in a courtroom.

From this posting....

http://physicsmathforums.com/showpost.php?p=5605&p...

this statement:

"No World Class Academic Has ever Defined (insert Scientific Word)" as the Defintion of the Definer must define the Definition that is being 'Defined' by said Definitioner as to have been seen as effectively Defining the Definition of Definition and Defined by the Use of Definition to Define its'elf.

It is a Philosphers' trick used to "pull the rug out from under" another, by questioning the definition of something/anything as it works out to be only your *subjective opinon* no matter how you do it. Especially when they will not cede to "common concensus" and even moreso in Science.

Go read this Authors Opinon, (link below) read it, and tell me if you can prove it wrong.

http://physicsmathforums.com/showpost.php?p=5989&p...

Honesty counts so only "yes" or "no" are acceptable answers, as the 'author' speaks for themselves in the opening title.

As to Conserve this Planet.

Simple suggestions, that anyone/everyone(?) can follow, that help to lower/slow/mitigate/better-control the Overall "Pollution"

P.S. No Politcal Speeches Please.