Dose Criminalizing the Possession of non-firearm Weaponry Violate the U.S. Constitution?

Question

Would you agree that  the U.S. constitution should grant mentally healthy; and competent, Americans the right to bear any non-military grade weaponry that they so choose to desire for the purpose of self-defense and defense of the lives of others?

No where in the U.S. constitution dose it state that the "Right to Bear Arms" strictly refers to firearms only but in stead uses the terms arms, as in armaments or weaponry in general and James Madison himself supports this in a court statement: “Are they not ourselves. … Congress have no power to disarm the militia(the American People). Their swords, and every other terrible instrument of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American. … The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”

If a state government criminalizes the possession of a non-firearm weapon for the purpose of defense of life, .... is that state violating Our Federal Rights?

Should you as a citizen be allowed to carry defensive knives, stun guns, batons, and martial arts weaponry with a proper permit?

Anonym · Accepted Answer

The federalist papers say that we the people have the right and duty to have in our possession any arms that the regulate soldier would carry in the field. It says nothing about only being allowed flintlock rifles as the liberal gun control bigots falsely claim.

The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights reads, "the right of the people (that is you and I and every other law abiding citizen) to keep and bear (that means to carry) arms (that means swords, knives or any other arms a soldier might carry in the field) shall NOT be infringed"

So to answer your question YES it means as a citizen you are allowed to carry defensive knives, stun guns, batons, and martial arts weaponry and the Second Amendment, or the federalist papers say anything about needing a proper permit to do so.

Tom · Answer

Technically the criminalization of ANY weaponry in unconstitutional!
The way that the constitution & the federalist papers are worded basically outlines the necessity for the citizens to be ready & able to overthrow the government at any time they determine it necessary.
99% of todays' laws are illegal. The only reason that they stand, is due to the stupidly compliant majority of citizens who continue to unknowingly obey them....

Dose Criminalizing the Possession of non-firearm Weaponry Violate the U.S. Constitution?

2 Antworten