Is there any good evidence atheism?

Agnostic/Gnostic = Knowledge

Atheist/Theist = Belief

Most atheists are agnostic-atheists.

Actually you're a bit backwrds in your line of questioning. See since you have faith, then you believe without fact. Some folks see faith as a sign of weakness, I however envy those with faith as I cannot find it.

Science has proven time and time again the stories in Genesis about creation are not true. As a matter of fact if you read the non-cannonical books of the Bible (yes there are more books from the same source that got voted out by teh churc a few hunderd years ago) you'll see a different story entirely.

I don't believe in God as you do because children die for no good reason. Because most religions despite their claim of enlightenment are driven by fear and greed. I have studied the Bible, religion and modern physics in great detail and I believe that religion is a great idea, but so was communism.

If there were a sentient being with allmighty powers why then do we not see him healing the sick any more? How does he let the AIDS virus exist in people who don't do drugs or practice unsafe sex?

You ask for facts and proof ok, dinosaurs did infact exist. They were around before humans, there's no contesting that it's a tens of thousands of years kind of difference. It's completely impossible that God only created Adam and Eve who had 2 sons (only 2 sons) and their sons had wives. Where did the wives come from??? God didn't make them and Adam and Eve didn't have them so eitehr Kane and Abel had sex with their mom then married their daughter/sisters or that's a load.

Edgar Casey was a very well known psychic who claimed to be able to leave his body and enter what he called the either. He healed the sick and foretold events that actually happened. He wasn't a Christian at all.

Now look at today, if someone came up to you and said "I am Jesus" you would think he's a nut job. You would probably go off on some hell fire and brimstone speech about how he's going to burn for blasphemy. What if he told you he spoke to God, you'd go off on that too.

You claim to see how someone pfoved God exists, the sad fact is it's harder to prove something doesn't exist than prove it does. Thusly people who believe in the Loc Ness Monster, Big Foot and little green men anally probing them can't be swayed.

That would be faith, that's what you have, not fact. Fact is what I have and what my belief is based upon. Either way in my opinion it's better to be open minded to someone else's beliefs and even respectful rather than try and spurn them due to what I believe.

First off, Christians have certainly provided reasons they believe in god, but that doesn't mean any of them have been good. Did I miss something? Is it suddenly better to have a bunch of bad reasons to think something than it is to have no reason to believe in something?

Secondly, I am an atheist, but I never say "there is no god." And really, I've encountered maybe one or two atheists online in the last few years who would. So this amounts to a straw-man issue. Very few people even make the argument you are trying to get us to defend.

I am an atheist because I reject claims made concerning the existence of god. Theists have the burden of proof, and atheism is the default position. Until I have been given evidence, I will continue to be an atheist.

Agnosticm and atheism are two different and not mutually exclusive things. Angostism refers to knowledge, while atheism refers to belief. I often identify as an agnostic atheist because I recognize that I don't know everything, but with the information I presently have, I currently do not see any reason to believe in a god(s).

Atheism doesn't require evidence, because it is not a belief system but rather a rejection of a belief system. Asking if there's any good evidence for atheism is like asking if there's any good evidence Santa doesn't exist, it's a silly question.

I've never seen theists provide reasonable evidence for God.

I'm pretty sure most atheists do not posit "There is (DEFINITELY) no God." but rather "I see no evidence for God."

Agnosticism and atheism are separate things. There is such a thing as an agnostic atheist.

Look up strong and weak atheism and get a better understanding of what atheism is.

I am an agnostic atheist. I am agnostic about pretty much everything, even the things I believe. Agnostic means you don't think something can be proven absolutely. I can't prove absolutely that Spider-Man isn't real. I can't prove absolutely that I am not an android replicant. I can't prove absolutely that we are not plugged into the matrix. I don't believe any of these to be true, however. This same thought process applies to God. I can't prove absolutely that God does not exist, but it is so ridiculously unlikely that I take it no more seriously than the possible existence of giant turtles holding up the earth.

I don't claim to know with absolute certainty that no god exists. I just haven't seen any compelling evidence that any do. Until sufficient evidence for one found, I have no reason to believe in any of them. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim -- in this case, people who claim a god exists.

I could ask you a similar question about leprechauns. We've all seen rainbows, and everybody knows that leprechauns keep pots of gold at the ends of them. Why don't you believe in leprechauns? Is there any evidence that they don't exist?

Leprechauns are more plausible than gods, because the claims made about them are less extraordinary. Less evidence of them would be required for justified belief. If you claim leprechauns don't exist, you should have no problem with claiming that gods don't exist, because there is insufficient evidence for either.

Does any evidence support the claim "there is no God".

all available evidence supports the fact that no gods exist!

""I've seen theists provide evidence for God,""

you have seen valid evidence for god? alert the News media..since NONE has ever been presented until now!!!

""but I never see any evidence against. ""

then you haven't been paying attention!

""Maybe today's the day I'll see it.""

with your eyes closed? I doubt you will see it

You have not seen theist provide any acceptable evidence for God. That debate has gone on for centuries and there is none. And it's the responsibility of the one making the wild claim to prove their claim. If you want me to believe that some supernatural being I can't touch or see or find any evidence for exists, it's up to you to prove it. In addition, it's impossible to prove that something doesn't exist. Prove to me that flying purple people eaters don't exist. You CAN'T!

"I've seen theists provide evidence for God" --- WHAT A FALSE STATEMENT.

Show me the proof??? God is highly unlikely but unknowable.

There is no evidence of any religious claim because it is false. In atheist case, there IS EVIDENCE for the BIG BANG, EVOLUTION and MUCH MORE!

The thing is, you can't use evidence to prove either that God exists or that he doesn't exist. So both sides, theists and atheists, challenge the other side for proof, and then when proof is not forthcoming, they walk away feeling they've won the argument.

My feeling is that if God does exist, then he must have set it up this way on purpose. He leaves us alone to find our own answers, and equips us well for the task. Clearly he wants us to accept him on faith, to -believe-, not to -know-. From that I gather that the choice to believe or not is up to each of us, it's an individual right.