is it true, that deep down inside all Atheists are Agnostic?

You either lack education, intellect or self confidence!

The only way primitive religion exists today is through the child abuse of forcing it into very, very young children but thanks to better education and growing intellects so many teens are able to discover the truth, throw off the indoctrination and step into the real world

Acceptance of a supernatural claim tends to promote cooperative social relationships. This communication demonstrates a willingness to accept, without skepticism, the influence of the speaker in a way similar to a child's acceptance of the influence of a parent. By encouraging this kind of behavior where the most intense social relationships occur it facilitates the lack of skepticism and deters more open minded thinking.

They are christian, Muslim or the other religions depending where they were born simply because they were indoctrinated by their parents as very young children. They will go on to indoctrinate their own children and those will go on to indoctrinate their grandchildren!

Atheists have the intellect to see through the conditioning and escape into the real world!

Agnostics have the intellect to see through the conditioning but lack the courage to throw of the conditioning entirely.

Sadly Christians, muslims and others are still held firmly prisoner by the self perpetuating brainwashing!

Atheism deals in belief, and agnosticism deals in knowledge. Atheists don't believe in any god, and agnostics feel one can't know for sure either way. I personally am an agnostic atheist. I don't believe in a god, but I admit that I don't know and could be wrong; I'm simply happier this way as it makes more logical sense to me.

In a perfect world, to me, everyone would admit to being agnostic, theists and atheists alike. (Well, really, in my perfect world there would be no religion, but we won't go there.) Claiming to have otherworldly knowledge that no one else is privy to seems kind of presumptuous and arrogant, whether you're saying 'there absolutely is a god' or 'there absolutely is not'.

However, the burden of proof does not lie on us, as we are not making the claim that there is something that can not be proven. I can sort of understand why atheists can claim that there is no god, not that they just don't believe in one, when theists can't provide evidence. It's like Russell's teapot. Sure, you can't really disprove the fact that there might be a teapot orbiting the Sun between it and the Earth, but is it really likely? And can you really expect others to believe you when you provide no evidence to the existence of this teapot?

I think that many atheists feel comfortable with being completely atheist when it comes to the basic christian version of god. but may be more comfortable with agnosticism when it comes to any other possible type of being,energy,or what have you. Atheists are basicly atheists because they say their is no evidence for the existence of god. Now if you show them some evidence i am sure you could change their mind but until then Atheist and agnostic --the difference does not mean much to a bible believer. neither one believes in your god one is just more open to evidence than the other kind of.

No, it's not true (assuming the common but incorrect meaning of "agnostic"). There's no reliable evidence for God/Yahweh, Jesus, Allah, Zeus, Odin, Quetzalcoatl, Vishnu, Thor, Shiva, or any of the thousands of other gods that people have worshiped. If any of the major gods existed, there would be reliable evidence. Since no such evidence exists, these gods do not exist. There's also extensive evidence that they are all just myths, created to help soothe our fear of death, and perpetuated through religion to subjugate the underclass into obedience.

BTW, are you obedient to your God? The Bible (supposedly written by God and prophets) is full of doctrines and examples that civilized people reject:

* Slavery

* Genocide

* Rape and Incest

* Male domination

* Female subjugation

* Blood sacrifice for atonement (including that of the mythical Jesus)

* Punishing the innocent to free the guilty

* Death penalty for minor infractions (over 50 verses -- see 1st link)

* Ancient myths about the origins of the world

Funny....I've seen for myself that believing in a God doesn't stop all theists from doing what THEY want....nothing but baseless assertions from someone too ignorant to grasp concepts of things he can't understand. I can't say beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is no God, because I can't prove he doesn't exist...but the fact that you who do claim to believe cannot prove he DOES exist gives me more legitimacy in rejecting your claims of a God.

No.

And I don't need to say "without a doubt" there is no god to not be an agnostic.

You don't seem to know what either "atheist" or "agnostic" means -- I suggest you learn about them before spouting about them.

Peace.

I actually think the possibility of there being a God is so remote, that it is safe to say there is no god, never has been a god and never will be a god. The flying spaghetti monster is more likely.

Agnostic is someone who doesn't know who to believe in.

Atheist is someone who doesn't believe or follow in God.

However atheists do not reject the possibilities of a Gods existence, merely the representations of a Gods existence through man made religion.

Regardless of whether the Atheist claim is true or not, it remains logically possible. The existence of the Christian version of "god" is logically disprovable. So you, as a Christian, are provably wrong either way.

Try studying basic logic.

Atheism is having a lack of belief in a god(s).So,how can an atheist not knowing for sure whether there is a god(s) or not affect his lack of belief in a god(s)?