Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.
Christians: How do you feel about this persons ability to 'Debate' religion?
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=201...
Do you feel that their argument is valid, or perhaps a little weak?
How does it make you feel about your religion in general?
Kriss: I'm not asking about the debate topic, but the manner in which this Christian 'debates' it.
Do you think that the Christian stance of "Argue my religion", "You're religion is wrong", "No it isn't!" is valid?
And you say that you are prepared to debate without becoming argumentative; that's what a debate is - A series of aguments that defend/rebut (Thanks Zorro) a position. That's what Christians don't seem to understand, that an debate is not just contradiction.
With that in mind, tell me; what makes you think you know what Gods purpose is?
UPDATE: Kriss, fair enough; though you're quite right that I don't really respect that answer, but I appreciate you taking the time to reply. Thanks.
8 Antworten
- vor 9 JahrenBeste Antwort
This person fits the saying of debating with a christian is like playing chess with a pigeon.
They fly down to the board, flap their wings and knock all the pieces off the board, crap on the board, and then fly away claiming victory.
The reason that the debate is weak is that the user has no proper concept of epistemology. Because she has no concept of what knowledge is and that she starts off by grounding idiotic assumptions as grand foundations for a theory/debate, she cannot win. A debate needs knowledge and rival opinions and theories bouncing off of each other in order to move towards a conclusion. Because she cannot understand what knowledge or truth is, she can't progress. She is therefore not smart enough to hold a debate
Quelle(n): Scott D. Weitzenhoffer made the christian - pigeon comment on Amazon.com regarding Eugenie Scotts’ book Evolution Vs. Creationism: An introduction (2004): - vor 9 Jahren
In my opinion this debate will continue until God reveals himself to all, if he does not then the debate will continue and go on and on.
I am a christian and this does nothing to affect my belief or faith in God and I do personally place all authority on the Bible as the word of God - but that is my choice.
I am always prepared to discuss the God//No God debate with people without feeling the need to become argumentative with people. - My apologies for the misunderstanding what I meant was I am always prepared to discuss the "debate" with people without the need for aggression as many people do. I dont claim that a debate is a contradiction it is 2 people/parties with different views being allowed to express each one their side and I believe that debates should be healthy and fun.
I also believe that there is a time coming soon when ALL will have to know that God exists and things will eventually be brought back into line with Gods original purpose.
I dont think that the manner of debate that you refer to is the correct way and I believe that it is full of flaws.
as for your last question you probably wont like my answer but because I have studied the Bible and other reference works I choose to believe what the bible says and attempt to apply it in my life, I dont claim that all answers are there but I do believe it reveals Gods purpose.
- ?Lv 7vor 9 Jahren
This is a futile exercise in Yahoo Answers as there is no tangible way to debate, and I love to debate religion. So Linda is nothing but a shmuck who pretends to be clever; one can only see what she rebuts "replies" in her "debate".
- Wie finden Sie die Antworten? Melden Sie sich an, um über die Antwort abzustimmen.
- FredLv 7vor 9 Jahren
What argument. My book of fairy tales exists, ergo it must be true. I really want it to be true, ergo it is true. These arguments have no content. I have heard much, much better silly arguments defending fairies than this.
- Fascinating...Lv 7vor 9 Jahren
This is why the god debate had become so tiresome; they make up their own evidence when there is none, and then disregard ours.
- Anonymvor 9 Jahren
It's quite obvious all of you were refusing to hear the truth.
- Anonymvor 9 Jahren
"Goddidit because the bible says so" isn't debating