Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.
Do you believe in global warming?
do you believe in global warming? give your opinion and facts to support it i myself will not say if i believe or not because that will get one of you angry and it will cause a flare and im not here for that but im asking to see how much people think it's happening and if they think it is a threat
20 Antworten
- Anonymvor 1 JahrzehntBeste Antwort
I dont think its a case of "Do you believe in global warming?"
Its more a "Do you believe the people showing you all the evidence and science stuff about Global Warming?"
Global Warming is not a religion, its something which, depending on who you believe, could be happening right now. There is loads of evidence, but if you choose to ignore it thats your choice.
I would say better safe than sorry. If there is a chance that Global Warming exists, you dont really want to cause the next generation to be lumped with a huge mess of a planet with nowhere else to go.
And just because you thought there was a possibility that all the people trying desperately to get you to believe them were lying?
- AndrewLv 7vor 1 Jahrzehnt
I do not believe, I am not religious. I am not angry, I am not religious fanatic. I can't say if AGW happening or not happening. This is scientific theory and until it is been proven to be an axiom, or at least has undoubted proof of this theory, I can't agree (I can't say believe, I am not religious) with that theory. And until now it does not have any scientifically proven data (too little data, too bias. 100 years or less can't proof climate changes or modifications even 200 years can't. Climate on this planet changes in hundred of thousands or even millions of years, so few hundred of years of data would means only weather changes, not a climate change, scientifically speaking. Computer based schema is total garbage. Like any computer Intelligent person could say garbage data in garbage out. So all these computer models don't proof a thing, if you miss single smallest part that have a role in the climate. And all of them miss much more than that. Bias or corruption is the only words can describe all computer models. After all scientist like money very much too (like any other mere people, may be even more), and can proof one way or another depends on who is paying.
I would love to know the truth, but I still don't to this moment. So I am skeptical on all of this. From my personal experience the weather and climate did not change since I was born. There are still 4 seasons and these are pretty much follow their patterns. There are some unexpected and unexplained events happened, but they did happened before even hundreds years ago. That is why they are unexpected and unexplained still.
- JimZLv 7vor 1 Jahrzehnt
As a scientist, I don't believe in anything. If I did I would save it for church. A scientists evaluates evidence and may make estimates of probabilities (not that those estimates are written in stone either) but must remain open if new information becomes available. I think the evidence is clear that the earth was a couple degrees cooler 300 years ago and has generally warmed since then. Most of that warming was before 1940 long before humans could have influenced it. Since it was already warming and CO2 has not been shown to be a driver of climate but a lagging indicator, I think the evidence suggests humans have had a minor to negligible effect on climate. Those who suggest humans are affecting climate have the burden of proof and so far they have failed miserably. The evidence that they produce is so flawed that it is ridiculous and insulting. Many of the so called climate scientists such as Mann and Hansen have behaved in such a non-scientific way, that they have threatened the reputation of science in general.
Note: No Al. What is troublesome are people who want to claim the ocean is acidic. It averages about 8 in the pH scale and there is next to zero chance it will ever be acidic. Additional CO2 dissolved in the ocean may make it slightly less alkaline but it is just another example of exaggeration that we get from alarmists and lack of scientific knowledge IMO.
- vor 1 Jahrzehnt
The national geographic magazine (the ones who blame humans for everything) has and article from 1973 called "ice on The world" . It talked About how many icecaps are expanding and there are record low temperetures across the USA. The article also states there is enough scientific evidence to prove that we are entering another ice age. This sounds like global cooling to me, but I don't know.... Maybe I should research more.
Quelle(n): Sorry for misspellings, I did this in my iPod - Wie finden Sie die Antworten? Melden Sie sich an, um über die Antwort abzustimmen.
- ?Lv 7vor 1 Jahrzehnt
yes. Just read the link.
Is it a threat? Sure, but a slow one. Over the years sea leve rise by a few inches at a time will make the coast line of Florida quite different in a 100 years. On the other hand, the Russians will be happy to have the Arctic having less ice for their ships. The larger threat is the weirder and more extreme weather, this includes droughts, flood and stronger hurricanes, but not tornadoes,
The more troublesome is the increased uptake of CO2 in the ocean causing acidity with the potential of affecting an entire food chain. So CO2 is not just about warming.
Quelle(n): http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/indicators/ - carreeLv 4vor 5 Jahren
i'm nonetheless somewhat sceptical, even nevertheless i surely care approximately our wild places. I do besides the shown fact that think of that we'd desire to consistently take the possibility heavily. The information proves that organic cycles of climate ensue on a grand scale. there have been as quickly as lions, hippos and elephants wandering the united kingdom geographical region, approximately a hundred and twenty,000 years in the past. That exchange into an interglacial heat spell. the ingredient that may no longer disputed, is that those issues take place clearly, in spite of everything the Scottish geographical region is complete of glacial helpful properties. besides the shown fact that, the information ability that our further contribution to worldwide warming is making it take place at a speedier fee than existence can shield. we are speaking approximately climate exchange happening in many years, somewhat than spanning centuries or hundreds of years. organic international has coped with climate exchange particularly properly interior the previous. woodlands and grasslands can circulate at their snails %., to maintain track of the situations that tournament them. these days there are further matters. we've our organic international trapped in wallet that are surrounded via farmland. The organic "corridors" are long gone. organic international charities are doing their superb to make our wild places extra joined up. If climate exchange keeps as this is and there is not any area for issues to circulate, then we can lose plenty. besides, i think of my considerable concern is that i do no longer decide on it to be genuine.
- GABYLv 7vor 1 Jahrzehnt
The globe has been in a long term warming trend for over 16,000 years, so I guess I believe in global warming. I also believe it is primarily a natural phenomenon.
- ?Lv 6vor 1 Jahrzehnt
Global warming is real. The fact that Kansas is no longer under a glacier is proof.
Man made global warming is a scam.
- Anonymvor 1 Jahrzehnt
Well... I do believe to some degree. I believe it should be global climate change instead. The entire world is changing the weather patterns, larger and more dangerous storms are happening, and crazy things that shouldn't be happening are. For example; all those tornadoes out west. And I do believe that there is a significant increase in temperature.
- vor 1 Jahrzehnt
Not to the extent people make it out to be. Global warming generally means that temperatures rise no matter what, and I don't believe this because we just had a cold winter and record lows during spring. However, I believe in the greenhouse effect, which means that all seasons are more extreme because we had a super cold and snowy winter, a super rainy spring, and intense wind storms now that tornado season is here.
Quelle(n): I live in Ohio, weirdest weather ever.