Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.
What is your opinion on acceleration of expansion of universe?
In the year 1998 two group of scientists have noticed accleartion of expansion of universe for few disant galaxies. Do you aceept cosmological constant of expansion for space & time. which is like antigrvaity force, if yes expalin
10 Antworten
- Vincent GLv 7vor 1 JahrzehntBeste Antwort
Explain? You must be kidding.
Science is not about opinion, it is about measurable facts.
If the universe is in an accelerating expansion, it IS in an accelerating expansion, and opinion has nothing to do with it.
Some may disagree, based on other data, but again, it is not a matter of opinion on the fact, but on what data to believe.
So, in order to explain what they see as an acceleration in the rate of expansion of the universe, they brought out the dark energy, which explains a behavior but without having any demonstrative capability yet.
- vor 1 Jahrzehnt
I think the first scientists problem today
to understand the nature of VACUUM.
================
Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and
their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks,
all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,
muons… gluons field ….. etc.) - was assembled in a "single point".
It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the "single point".
The answer is :
EMPTINESS- NOTHING….!!!
Ok!
But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?
I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that
is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition
by the formula T=0K.
* * *
Once there was a "Big Bang".
But in what space had the Big Bang taken place
and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed?
Not in T=0K?
It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in T=0K.
Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is
in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests relic radiation of the Big Bang ).
But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change and decrease.
What temperature can this radiation reach?
Not T=0K?
Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the future,
we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING T=0K.
Therefore it is necessary to begin to think from T=0K.
===== ========
About the theory of the "Big Bang" is written the thick (very thick) books.
But anywhere do not write about the reason of the "Big Bang".
Anybody does not know it.
I know.
Action, when the God opens his palm,
have named the "Big Bang".
And action, when the God compresses his palm,
have named " a single point".
===========================
The Physics is first of all Vacuum.
Quelle(n): http://www.socratus.com/ - scowieLv 6vor 7 Jahren
It's a load of rubbish. The universe isn't actually expanding at all. The idea that it does comes from misinterpreting galactic redshifts as a doppler effect when they are actually a scattering effect. The galaxies are not generally receding from each other at all. Their light simply loses energy through it's interaction with the molecular hydrogen of the intergalactic medium:
http://www.newtonphysics.on.ca/universe/
If expanding space was responsible for cosmological redshifts it would cause a reduction in the surface brightness of distant galaxies but we find this is not the case:
http://www.sci-news.com/astronomy/science-universe...
Also, as well as stretching out the wavelengths of light, expanding space would stretch out the light curves of quasars (their oscillation in luminance). No sign of this either:
http://phys.org/news190027752.html
This documentary may enlighten you:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFFl9S39CTM There never was a Big Bang.
- Anonymvor 1 Jahrzehnt
No - even Charles Darwin's theory is wrong which is aware to those who are interested in the welfare of the world. This earth, this world, these human beings and our future generation are to be alive at all times with happiness and prosperity. In such case, expansion of the earth is more important than the expansion of the universe as we can do anything only on earth and not the outer space. You and I would leave in this body only for 100 years if not less.
- Wie finden Sie die Antworten? Melden Sie sich an, um über die Antwort abzustimmen.
- Anonymvor 1 Jahrzehnt
astronomical objects were moving away from us ("Hubble's law") as predicted by a universal expansion.[2] Using the redshift of their electromagnetic spectra to determine the distance and speed of remote objects in space, he showed that all objects are moving away from us, and that their speed is proportional to their distance, a feature of metric expansion. Further studies have since shown the expansion to be extremely isotropic and homogenous, that is, it does not seem to have a special point as a "center", but appears universal and independent of any fixed central point.
In studies of large-scale structure of the cosmos taken from redshift surveys a so-called "End of Greatness" was discovered
Quelle(n): wickpedia - Anonymvor 1 Jahrzehnt
I know some of the researchers in Berkeley and their methods. It is solid science and the data is clear. What it means is maybe less clear. I think the biggest problem facing scientists today, and particularly astrophysicists is understanding the nature and mechanism of gravity. There is a lot more work to be done.
- ThermoLv 6vor 1 Jahrzehnt
The whole concept is nonsense. It has been based on the fact that the redshift is only due to the Doppler effect. To my opinion the Compton effect gives as well an important contribution to the observed redshift.
Th
- Anonymvor 1 Jahrzehnt
To me, antigravity and dark energy and things like that are just too strange. They have been pulled out of a hat to explain observations for which there is no current explanation. They have never been directly detected or observed.
To me it's like observing 'mars is retrograde' and then saying 'oh! must be due to epicycles!'. We don't quite have the full picture yet.
I believe there is a simpler, better explanation out there. If we think harder, we just might work out what it is.
- Billy ButtheadLv 7vor 1 Jahrzehnt
The universe originally expanded at the speed of light,so it can't accelerate.
As the angle of it's components diverge farther it will slow down.
This will probably be the beginning of it's demise.
- Anonymvor 1 Jahrzehnt
no. i think the uni is just there and its neither expanding nor is it decreasing. that's a concept that's hard for people who want so solve everything with math-to grasp.
and no i am not religious. far from it. god has nothing to do with the uni. something people are just gonna have to accept.