Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.

What're the most convincing UFO accounts you've read or heard of ; and how do you explain them ?

Update:

Campbell : (for the Lonnie Zamora case) do you think the white craft and its occupants were from a mothership ? Could the aliens breathe earth air unassisted ?

6 Antworten

Relevanz
  • Anonym
    vor 1 Woche

    The O Hare UFO, sighted by many credible witnesses, about 15 years ago, is the most credible account I have ever heard of. Official Explanation- "weather phenomenon". 

    Oh, okay.

  • vor 2 Wochen

    There are things I've seen that I can't explain - and I've read accounts by people that may or may not have only been stories... so far, nothing has convinced me of visits to Earth by ETs. 

  • Bill-M
    Lv 7
    vor 2 Wochen

    Nothing has convinced me that E.T. Exists.   Most UFO's are man made right here on Earth.

  • Anonym
    vor 2 Wochen

    Giza Pyramids.

  • Wie finden Sie die Antworten? Melden Sie sich an, um über die Antwort abzustimmen.
  • David
    Lv 4
    vor 2 Wochen

    Not one single UFO account I have read or heard has been convincing or even remotely credible.

  • ?
    Lv 6
    vor 2 Wochen

    I have been involved with the ufo scene for half a century, and in all that time I have yet to come upon a "ufo account" that is anything more than some Earthly phenomenon, either natural or artificial.

    Often the explanation is right there in the mind of the observer. The witness wants to believe in some sort of unearthly nonsense, so they either deliberately or subconsciously hype up whatever they saw.

    IMAO the psychology of ufos is not given enough priority. Instead of first asking about the mind state of the witness and indeed the collective mindstate of contemporary western society in general, and working from there, the usual pattern is to jump strait to the ET hypothesis. This is summed up nicely by the principle so dearly held amongst the believers: "don't know what it is therefore it must be space boogiemen".

    There are plenty of ufo encounters which convincingly indicate we are dealing with a primarily psychological phenomenon. A mass delusion basically. Any ufo "sighting" or encounter is easily and convincingly explained by the science of psychology. They have nothing to do with the physical sciences, and are certainly irrelevant to astronomy.

Haben Sie noch Fragen? Jetzt beantworten lassen.