Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.

How Does the "Bank Examiner Swindle" on Dragnet Make Sense?

In the Dragnet TV show, Episode 6 in Season 1 (original broadcast date February 23, 1967), is the “Bank Examiner Swindle.” Two crooks, posing as bank examiners, persuade elderly customers to withdraw cash from the bank. The crooks mark the money and say they will redeposit into the bank, so that they can see which “dishonest teller” is “pilfering the accounts.”

How does this scenario even make sense? The cash in the till does not belong to any customer in particular. Each teller is required to account for his own cash, and if he is short, he will have to explain the shortage. If a bank employee is stealing cash from the bank, why would the bank need a customer to withdraw cash in order for the thief to be caught?Are there people really so stupid to fall for this scheme?

4 Antworten

Relevanz
  • vor 4 Wochen
    Beste Antwort

    Some people trust apparent authority. The underlying swindle doesn't have to make sense. As long as the person believes they are helping a legal authority, that is all they really think about.

  • vor 4 Wochen

    Yes, there are people who fall for the scheme.  I don't know whether they're stupid or just ignorant.  It's a real scheme that does work.  I've watched real video (on the news, not Dragnet) of a reporter or producer trying it with a hidden camera, and then explaining it had been a scam and returning the money.

  • vor 4 Wochen

    They don't, they count on the elderly not understanding how stuff works.  

  • Anonym
    vor 4 Wochen

    It doesn't.  You are comparing TV with real life.  They are NOT the same.  This is an actual scam.  People have actually believed the scam.  Maybe they don't realize that the cash in the "till" (I presume you mean teller's draw) no longer belongs to a specific customer.  Yes, people are "so stupid" to fall for this scheme.  Other people are "so stupid" that they don't do any research before they post.  This will be a LOT less amusing when it happens to one of your Grandparents.

    .

    Does it make sense that IRS will have someone arrested if he/she doesn't send a WalMart gift card to a stranger?  No.  Do people believe it?  Yes.

Haben Sie noch Fragen? Jetzt beantworten lassen.