Is Johnson and Johnson shameless with that jaundiced baby commercial since they didn't do that and they DID cause cancer?

SHAMELESS

a judgement by one person or group

that another person or groups behavior is unacceptable

BABIES did no not get CANCER from J&J talc

Adult women did from using the talc for FEMININE hygiene

What even worse is being a childish moron posting a stupid question like this so you can answer it on your alt accounts as if anyone agreed with your moronic opinion.

What Johnson and Johnson did was horrible and unforgivable. They knowingly sold baby powder for decades to millions, causing millions of women now to have uterine cancer. That, and not the cure for infant jaundice, is their real legacy. The commercial implying that they "care for" babies or have a tradition of it is a nightmarish mockery of the truth, and adds a ghastly insult to the grievous injury of millions of babies' lives. Our Society needs to stop tolerating heinous crimes, actual atrocities committed by corporations just because those corporations make millions or billions of dollars doing it. Making money is not a justification for mass murder. 

Shameless, yes. Johnson & Johnson should really have been driven out of business after murdering millions of people with carcinogenic talcum powder. Their television commercial with the cure of infant jaundice implies that they found the cure, which they did not. Like posing Adolf Hitler with puppies. 

Yes, it is disgusting that they attach themselves to the nurse finding that sunlight was the cure for infant jaundice, which had nothing to do with Johnson & Johnson. But they did cause millions of babies for decades to have an eventual death sentence knowing they were selling baby powder with carcinogens.