Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.

Is the greatest common divisor of n^17+9 and (n+1)^17 + 9, always = 1 for any integer value of n?

2 Antworten

Relevanz
  • ?
    Lv 6
    vor 2 Jahren
    Beste Antwort

    Good question. It sure looks like it.

    I've crunched a lot of numbers looking for a value of n where it's not, but haven't found any. I used Wolfram Alpha up to n=20, and GCD is always 1.

    The Polynomial GCD of n^17+9 and (n+1)^17 + 9 is 1, but I'm not sure how that would help.

    I'd sure like to see a rigorous answer to this one.

    It seems that n^p+9 and (n+1)^p + 9 are always relatively prime. I'm not sure what the role of 9 is.

    It's not true that n^p + k and (n+1)^p + k are relatively prime for any prime p and natural number k, since GCD (6^13+ 1, 7^13 + 1) = 53. That tells you that any theorem about this, if there is any, can't be TOO general. (But change the 1 to anything greater, and I can't find a counterexample for exponent 13.)

    It appears that there is always some n for which n^p+1 and (n+1)^p + 1 will have a GCD of ep+1, where e is some even number.

    7 = GCD(5^3+9, 6^3+9)

    11 = GCD(6^5+9, 7^5+9)

    23 = GCD(10^11+9, 11^11+9)

    53 = GCD(6^13+9, 7^13+9)

    Maybe that's because n+1 and (n+1) + 1 are factors of n^p + 1 and (n+1)^p + 1, but why that would help isn't clear.

  • vor 2 Jahren

    It's a trick question. The gcd is >1 for n = 8424432925592889329288197322308900672459420460792433. That's the lowest value of n (51 digits!).

Haben Sie noch Fragen? Jetzt beantworten lassen.