Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.

If the meteorologists can't get it right, what makes folks think that the climatologists can either?

The meteorologists were calling for a major snow storm in the north east yesterday. Heavy snows from DC to Maine. In the end, they got some heavy snow in the upper north east, but the rest, even as far as New York was...if not a minor event, a far cry from what was predicted.

And this is with radar! They can actually see the storm! They can darned near look out the bloody window and see the thing and yet, with this real time view, their 'models' and their 'I can actually see it!' data, they were still WAY off. And this is here and now!

And yet we are told that global warming and climate change are 'settled science', led to believe that climatologists with nothing but their theories, their models and research papers making predictions 50 years out are infallible. To even question their predictions is to deny science! Seriously?

7 Antworten

Relevanz
  • vor 4 Jahren
    Beste Antwort

    Here's a better rebuttal against man-made global warming: CO2 accounts for approximately 4% of the greenhouse effect, while water vapor accounts for over 95% of the greenhouse effect. The keys is the difference between a molecule of CO2 and one of H2O. CO2 is a linear molecule, so it only has 3 possible vibrational states. This means it can only absorb a small range of radiation. H2O, however, is a bending molecule. It has 6 different vibrational states. It can absorb radiation across the spectrum, overlapping the wavelengths that CO2 can absorb. This is why water vapour is the dominant greenhouse gas and CO2 is insignificant.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    vor 4 Jahren

    And if you go back to what the models were predicting 10 or even 5 years ago you will see how unreliable they are.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    vor 4 Jahren

    lol you don't have a meteorological clue. what a dumbfook

  • Anonym
    vor 4 Jahren

    Snow is made of what ? Water

    The source of that water is what ? Evaporation

    The cause of that evaporation is what ? Heat

    Therefore by increasing the rate of evaporation global warming can and does cause heavy snowfalls

    In fact some of the heaviest snowfalls in NYC history have happened in March when warm moist air moving north from the Gulf and the Atlantic collides with a cold Artic air mass moving south

    I live 3 miles from the Gulf and it's current temp is 75 F

  • Wie finden Sie die Antworten? Melden Sie sich an, um über die Antwort abzustimmen.
  • ?
    Lv 7
    vor 4 Jahren

    i just got done shoveling almost the exact amount of snow forecasted from my driveway right here in south central pennsylvania.

    so much for your skepticism.

  • Anonym
    vor 4 Jahren

    You really should take a science course.

  • vor 4 Jahren

    Exactly. There is only one absolute in our world, and that is the Holy Bible.

Haben Sie noch Fragen? Jetzt beantworten lassen.