Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.
I have searched some web sites to see the results of Canon 1100D.?
and at last I found the stunning pictures taken from Canon 1100D, i.e. www.juzaphoto.com in the review section. I would like to ask that, the pictures posted in this site are fake or true ...I am asking curiously bcoz i have seen really stunning pictures taken from canon 1100D it was unbelievable as i could not shoot that great pictures from my Canon 1100D. Please go and check the site.
7 Antworten
- vor 7 JahrenBeste Antwort
I completely agree to the members that taking good picture is all about you, cameras and the good lenses attached with it, Even from a low pixel cameras a good photographer can take real good pics....
Also no one can verify that these pictures were taken from which camera.....
- PhotofoxLv 7vor 7 Jahren
ANY DSLR is capable of taking stunning photos. The results depend on two other factors a) The quality of the lens and b) The skill of the photographer.
- Anonymvor 7 Jahren
Most people actually find that using their camera helps improve their photography skills...
Just what are you expecting to gain or benefit from searching websites for other peoples results using the same camera...your 1100D cant produce stunning or unbelievable results if it's gathering dust while you waste your time looking at other peoples shots...
Do us all a favour...WAKE UP...!
- ?Lv 6vor 7 Jahren
I don't need to go to any particular website to know that any DSLR is capable of producing stunning photographs.
If you can't get good photos from your DSLR, it's because you don't know how to take a good photo.
- Wie finden Sie die Antworten? Melden Sie sich an, um über die Antwort abzustimmen.
- vor 7 Jahren
Composition and camera handling skills are a big part. The camera's capability is a factor. In some ways the absolute limits of the camera are not tested by these shots. They are downsized to 1200 pixels long. If a shot looks a little bit soft at 4272 x 2848 it can still look sharp at 1200 pixels long, although if it is very soft it won't. The color balance, brightness, contrast, and saturation can be tweaked a little in software, although if the original is very far off it can't be made great. A reason for shooting RAW is that it provides more latitude for making adjustment, as photo editing is really a subtractive process. The camera's processor converting to .jpg is already doing a little bit of automated photo editing. Some pictures shown in monochrome were chosen for dramatic effect, but sometimes the hopelessness of getting the white balance correct was a consideration.
- keerokLv 7vor 7 Jahren
If they were real, it does not matter. You are not assured of getting the same results if you get the same camera model. Picture quality depends mostly on user skill. The camera is only a tool.
- ?Lv 7vor 7 Jahren
He's right. If the camera takes lousy photos, it's seldom the camera's fault - you can't buy the skill and experience you need to get the best out of a DSLR.