Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.

Can these 9 pieces be put together into a 3 x 3 x 3 cube?

Check out graphic of pieces:

http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh120/Scythian1...

On the left is a piece composed of 7 small cubes as shown, and on the right is 1 small cube. You have 3 of the pieces on the left, and 6 small cubes. Is it possible to assemble these 9 pieces together into a 3 x 3 x 3 cube? The 3 pieces that are composed of 7 small cubes are identical, no mirror copies are allowed. All small cubes are of the same size, so that:

3 pieces composed of 7 small cubes each = 21

21 + 6 small cubes = 27 = 3 x 3 x 3 cube.

Update:

Starrysky, if each of the 7-cube pieces take up 2 full edges of the 3 x 3 x 3 cube, or 3 corners, isn't that more than the 8 corners the cube has?

Update 2:

Some kind of sketch or diagram would be nice, otherwise other people will either 1) think it's not a solved puzzle, or 2) think it's a solved puzzle. And we wouldn't want that, right?

Update 3:

Falzoon, you've deduced that the 3 pieces can't each take up 3 corners of the 3 x 3 x 3 cube. We know this now. But does that mean a solution is impossible?

Update 4:

Quadrillerator, I don't have a convenient 3D drawing facility that can quickly put together an image of this problem, solved or not. What I can do is to post a wire frame of 27 nodes, the nodes which can be drawn over to indicate where the 7-cube pieces go, e.g., using squares, triangles, circles. Or you can go ahead and continue to use coordinates {x, y, z}, where x, y, z = -1, 0, 1.

Update 8:

I think the 3rd graphic above is probably best to use?

Update 9:

Quadrillerator, you're the only one here working towards a conclusive resolution, so certainly this will be left open for a while.

3 Antworten

Relevanz
  • jibz
    Lv 6
    vor 7 Jahren
    Beste Antwort

    Let the 27 components of the cube be {-1,0,1}^3. Then the three 7-component pieces can be arranged this way:

    (1): (-1, -1, -1), (-1, 0, -1), (-1, 0, 0), (-1, 0, 1), (0, 0, -1), (1, 0, -1 ), (1, -1,-1),

    (2): (1, -1, 1), (1, -1, 0), (0, -1, 0), (-1, -1, 0), (1, 0, 0), (1, 1, 0 ), (1, 1, 1),

    (3): (-1, 1, 1), (0, 1, 1), (0, 0, 1), (0, -1, 1), (0, 1, 0), (0, 1, -1), (-1, 1, -1).

    In other words, if we take (1) to be the original copy, then we can obtain (2) and (3) via the orthonormal transforms

    ((0, 1, 0), (0, 0, -1), (-1, 0, 0)), and

    ((0, 0, -1), (1, 0, 0), (0, -1, 0),

    respectively.

    Attachment image
  • vor 7 Jahren

    I say it's not possible.

    First, the 3x3 L-shaped piece can only have it's middle cube in a corner.

    The 3x3 L-piece takes up 3 corners.

    So three 3x3 L-pieces would take up 9 corners.

    But a cube has only 8 corners.

    Ah! yes, I can see that at least one 7-cube piece can have the 3x3 piece as the

    middle of two faces, but I'm unable to prove a cube can or cannot be formed,

    as my 3D glasses are broken.

  • vor 7 Jahren

    Consider the cube, M, of the 7-er that has the most number of cubes attached to it. It's clear that that can't occupy three corner position, because each time it occupies a corner position, it takes two other corners with it, and we don't have 9 corners. Also, it's clear that one of the unused singletons will be the center cube of the large cube.

    So I don't have drawing software. If you can recommend a free website where I could conveniently assemble an image, I might give that a go. Otherwise, I could withdraw my entry. I'll take it that the centers of my cubes are at integer positions in (a,b,c) where each of a,b,c are integers ranging from -1 to 1, the center cube being at (0,0,0).

    Let F be the cube on the 7-er that is farthest from M. If I give the positions of M and F, that will specify the layout completely:

    7-er 1: M:(-1,0,-1), F:(1,-1,-1)

    7-er 2: M:(0,1,1), F:(-1,1,-1)

    7-er 3: M:(1,-1,0), F:(1,1,1)

    Singletons: (0,0,0), (0,-1,-1), (-1,1,0), (1,1,-1), (1,0,1), (-1,-1,1)

    Remaining cubes:

    7-er 1: (-1,-1,-1), (-1,0,0), (-1,0,1), (0,0,-1), (1,0,-1)

    7-er 2: (0,1,0), (0,1,-1), (-1,1,1), (0,0,1), (0,-1,1)

    7-er 3: (-1,-1,0), (0,-1,0), (1,0,0), (1,1,0), (1,-1,1)

    Update: It seems to me that putting M at a non-corner leaves only two possible corners for the other two Ms, but neither of them work. Ie. all three Ms must be an non corners. And given that, I think the solution is forced since that means each 7-er takes out an adjacent pair of center face cubes.

    Scythian, thanks for that. I'm not sure I'll have the time today to color your cube in, but I hope to get back to it.

Haben Sie noch Fragen? Jetzt beantworten lassen.