Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.
Is Sri Yukteshwar right when assuming that our sun revolves around another sun in 24.000 years?
In his book from 1898, he refers to ancient Indian astronomy.
3 Antworten
- vor 8 JahrenBeste Antwort
At 24,000 years, that would put the 'other sun' at about 2.2 light years, assuming it's around the same mass as our sun, and... no, we've seen nothing.
- John WLv 7vor 8 Jahren
The idea that our Sun is one of a binary pair is a way of explaining the 24,000 year precession. But we've been able to see brown dwarf binary pairs such as WISE J1049-5319 just 6.5 light years away so why haven't we seen a binary to our Sun even if it were a brown dwarf as we would know it's supposed location. Seems that once again, Indian Astronomy is likely wrong, of course, none of the believers ever note it's many failures.
- Anonymvor 8 Jahren
No.
There is no scientific evidence to support that. And astronomers have been searching for a companion sun for a long time.
"Ancient" does not always mean "right".
