evolution refuted? REALLY?

Wow.

That was just ...

Wow.

Remember the Scopes Monkey Trial? William Jennings Bryan believed in evolution, he just did not believe in Human Evolution. Science tells me all the evidence points towards evolution. Creationists have changed their arguments very little over the last 117 years.

In 1923, an exasperated Republican, Nobel Physicist and President of the California Institute of Technology, Robert A Millikan, wrote that creationists were, “ men whose decisions have been formed, as are all decisions in the jungle, by instinct, by impulse, by inherited loves and hates, instead of reason. Such people are a menace to democracy and civilisation.”

You just linked this for us. Can we laugh at you now?

Seriously, I'm not a Creationist. I'm a Christian who believes in Theistic Evolution, the idea that God used evolution as his vehicle to bring forth mankind as his special creation. I am not a scientist, but from everything I have seen I favour evolution to be the most likely way that life came to be what it is today.

I wouldn't say people should be publicly laughed at for their beliefs. Everyone deserves to believe whatever they want, even if it's totally unscientific. As long as they keep it out of the science classroom, that should be enough :)

Nothing comes from nothing.

Life comes from life.

Evolution does not have a starting point, so the whole theory has no foundation. End of story.

Mutations happen, natural selection happen, Darwinist evolution doesn't.

Well, you just linked us to it. But I prefer to laugh with you, rather than at you.

Well, once he gets his Nobel Prize, who'll be laughing then?!?

That is kind of silly, people spending so much time an energy trying to refute something that has not even been proven in the first place. ROFL

What's scary is that some people will read that and think it makes sense.

Yes, they should.

Absolutely!

Thanks for the link! Lots of fabulous info on there!

All the best! :)