Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.

I have old Kodak film Camera of 35mm film, can i take picture of fullframe quality from that Camera?

While cleaning my wardrobe I found my old Kodak film camera of 35 mm film, which is equivalent to full frame camera can i take picture of full frame quality. But it is not an SLR, it is a simple camera.

4 Antworten

Relevanz
  • keerok
    Lv 7
    vor 8 Jahren
    Beste Antwort

    Full frame pertains to a digital camera's sensor size which is equal to that of a frame of 35mm film. Your camera is full frame.

    Picture quality does not depend on film or sensor size, you will have trouble getting more than decent shots with that 35mm point-and-shoot camera due to the very low quality of optics it has. You will encounter the same problem even if you were handed a full-frame dSLR for another reason. Skill is what dictates picture quality. The camera is only a tool.

  • Anonym
    vor 5 Jahren

    Oh you'll be fine with the Canon. Since you're moving from an AF/AE 35mm SLR it's just like getting a new car and not knowing where the buttons and knobs are any more. Photography skills can't be lost, so you should be able pick things up after reading the manual. Only a couple of things may be different: - Multi point autofocus - 'film' now lasts over 300 shots between changes. - And you can see the result of your photo instantly. - Less confusing metering system. But pretty much everything is the same except improved from before and buttons have been moved elsewhere.

  • vor 8 Jahren

    35mm in the time when that camera was made was one of many formats. 120 roll film, 127 and even half-frame (of 35mm) were popular. The image quality, as others explained, will depend upon the quality of the optics and the lighting conditions.

    Why not get a roll of film for that camera and send it off to be processed and scanned at high definition?

    This photo I took on an old Olympus SLR film camera with even older 17mm lens. I scanned the 6"x4" photo at 300dpi on my HP printer. You should get better results if they scan the negative at high resolution.

    http://www.pbase.com/johnfr/image/46262520.jpg

    So basically it is an interesting thing to do, but modern digital, even from cameras with tiny 1/1.7 sensors, should offer better quality.

  • Jim A
    Lv 7
    vor 8 Jahren

    Well no because film looks different that digital does - simple as that.

    35mm film is what it is regardless of the camera. The trick with film is the lenses and knowing how to properly expose it with shutter speed and aperture. On a small Kodak I think everything is automatic.

    The film will look as good as it can in that camera but it won't be as sharp and crisp as any digital camera, full frame or not.

Haben Sie noch Fragen? Jetzt beantworten lassen.