Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.

What would you do if?

Think, that you are a really good person and you dont tell a lie ever. What would you do if a murderer is standing right on your head with his gun on your head, and he is asking you to tell something that only you know. You know that the murderer is not having good intentions of asking it and he will mis-use that information(that only you have). and if you dont tell him, he will shoot you. So what would you do in such a case?.

a. you would lie.

b. you would tell the truth

c. you would let him shoot you

I mean what would be a right thing to do here(in this case)? Will it be ok to lie, cause i know telling a lie isnt good.

Update:

What if he dont shoot you if u tell the truth. But if you tell the truth, you are giving him some info that he will mis-use. So what would u do?

Update 2:

I mean would it be good for me to tell the truth and save myself but put someone else life in danger.

or would if be good to tell a lie, that will have a probability that i would be saved, cause he wouldnt know i am lieing.But afterall lieing isnt good.

13 Antworten

Relevanz
  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt
    Beste Antwort

    Well, if telling the truth means that someone would die, I would not tell him anything. I would allow myself to be shot, because I know that this particular life is not all there is, and if Jesus is willing, I will incarnate again. I am not so attached to this life that I would lie.

  • Anonym
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    Well, we can examine this with either Deontological ethics or Utilitarian calculus. Following Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative (Deontological ethics/Moral Absolutism), the person would have the duty to uphold absolute morality meaning that lying is not an option, no matter the consequences, this could be seen as either option B or option C.

    Another view would be John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism which would be ensuring the greatest happiness for the greatest amount of people. Following Utilitarian calculus, option A would ensure that harm is prevented by withholding information from a dangerous individual and would grant you safety.

    In this particular situation, I would personally ignore Kant's philosophy and lie. I personally have no problem with lying and I wouldn't feel bad at all to lie for something important.

  • Corey
    Lv 7
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    Not lying ever has little to do with being a good person.

    If only I know something, then I'm not going to tell a murder who is about to murder me. And lying would give them as much information as telling the truth. I suspect I am not confident enought to pull of a lie with a gun pointed at my head. The chance that he'd kill me if I spoke and stop being useful than if I had information he needed.

  • MK6
    Lv 7
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    He's gonna shoot you anyway. - c.

    You've already defined him as a 'murderer'. These people can't just stop a causing one death.

    But I've read the question, - "Do I loose all respect for myself, - before my own death, by giving my killer what he wants, - and that my truthy answer will be the catalyst that he pulls the trigger".

  • Wie finden Sie die Antworten? Melden Sie sich an, um über die Antwort abzustimmen.
  • KC
    Lv 4
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    This is when thoughtless wisdom comes into action during the emergency it is beyond all/uncorrupted. It is just that or simply it is neither lie nor truth but it is just it is.

  • Anonym
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    I'd probably lie, but then he'd probably shoot me anyway, but the joke would be on him, eh? I told him a huge ******* lie.

  • Anonym
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    Lying in the above situation as a form of self-defence (or protection of others) is permissible.

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    think what would cause a worse outcome- you lieing, or him doin more evil with the info you give him, lesser of 2 evils really

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    d. Tell him to put the gun away, because I'm the only one who knows what he wants to know - he can't kill me. Then bargain or beat him down, depending on how physically dangerous he is.

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    he might shoot me in the struggle that ensued,but i would not allow him to shoot me.wich he would do if i told him or not.

Haben Sie noch Fragen? Jetzt beantworten lassen.