Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.

Creationists, please explain?

So, this snake has a foot-

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/wildlife/6187320/...

Why would God allow a snake to have the DNA needed to build a foot?

Or will you argue that it doesn't, and God just willed this one snake to have a clodhopper?

Does it not seem more likely that a snake can grow a foot because it evolved from something that once had them? Just curious how you can explain this away logically.

Update:

God's Servant, your lack of science education is showing. Nobody is suggesting a fully formed leg appears on animals with no prior history of legs. What is being said is that the reason that DNA is there is because it used to be in use. And macroevolution is just microevolution writ large. Your lack of ability to understand timescales longer than 6000 years does not invalidate science.

And to those of you who said God took away snakes legs- what, was this one extra good and allowed to have one back? Pathetic.

10 Antworten

Relevanz
  • Beste Antwort

    OMG deleterious mutation!

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    Hi,

    I don't understand, the snake it said to be beaten to death, put in alcohol but in the snapshot he seems to be very alive... It is said to be in a chinese university but it is in the sand.

    Is there any confirmation? It does seem to be a fake.

    Regards,

    Emmanuel

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    because if you read the bible in the garden they had legs and God cursed them to crawl on their bellies. He took away the legs.

    No they did not evolve from another species

    the article goes on to say the common thing from dna mutation is for snakes too have two heads.

    it is not proof it evolved from another species or macro evolution.

    its proof of micro evolution as science would call it gene mutations of dna material it already contain not that miraculously appeared from no where.

    there is no such thing of DNA mutating to form usable limbs out of nowhere or that is not already in its DNA code.

  • BLW
    Lv 5
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    Gen 3:14 So the LORD God said to the serpent: "Because you have done this, You are cursed more than all cattle, And more than every beast of the field; On your belly you shall go, And you shall eat dust All the days of your life.

    Actually, this explains why they don't have legs, it does not explain why that one does.

    Are you sure that was not photoshopped?

  • Wie finden Sie die Antworten? Melden Sie sich an, um über die Antwort abzustimmen.
  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    My friend

    The serpent in the time of creation was a beautiful creature, and had legs.

    It was cursed by God to crawl on its belly.

    Due to satan using it to tempt the woman.

    All of nature today is subject to abnormalities, because of what man is doing to the earth with pollution. Some animals are born with 2 heads and so on .

    peace

    a friend

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    well you see the snake was at this party one night and had a little bit too much to drink when he spotted this cute little lizard, the rest is history

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    That's incredible. I bet Darwin wishes he could have been around to see that.

  • Anonym
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    the devil put it there to test your faith!!!

    though some snakes already have spurs which are vestigal legs.

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    If you cant see that picture was doctored. Than you never used a Photoshop program

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    If it had evolved from something that had a foot then it wouldn't grow feet anymore. So this would be a huge hole in the theory of evolution.

Haben Sie noch Fragen? Jetzt beantworten lassen.