Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.

Was life created by God, pure chance or simulation?

What do you think?

10 Antworten

Relevanz
  • Anonym
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt
    Beste Antwort

    What I know is that life is a delicate dance between the beauty of it and the pointlessness of it all, so it's best not to think too deeply about it. Enjoy it because the ultimate "truth" is that it's the ONLY life we know for certain [no evidence ever for an "afterlife].

    If I were asked to open three doors representing God, pure chance, and simulation, I would have to emphatically decline, since none of these have anything to do with why I have life.

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    Since there's no evidence as to the existence of God, I can rule that one out.

    Abiogenesis gives us a lot of info as to how life exactly originated in this world. It depicts the original environment and chemical reactions which gave rise to the formation of life.

    Take a look at this:

    Amino acids, often called "the building blocks of life", can form via natural chemical reactions unrelated to life, as demonstrated in the Miller-Urey experiment, which involved simulating the conditions of the early Earth. In all living things, these amino acids are organized into proteins, and the construction of these proteins is mediated by nucleic acids. Thus the question of how life on Earth originated is a question of how the first nucleic acids arose.

    Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis

  • Anonym
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    Why do you insist on calling natural processes "pure chance"? If nature was "pure chance" then there would be no laws of nature, there would be no way to predict natural events, and computers and other devices would be physical impossibilities.

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    It isn't just chance, there are other processes at work. If you think abiogenesis is "just pure chance" you really need to read up on modern hypotheses.

    I'll go with science.

    Quelle(n): If God created life, who created God? If God gets to be an exception, why not life?
  • Wie finden Sie die Antworten? Melden Sie sich an, um über die Antwort abzustimmen.
  • Anonym
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    Life was created by Japanese anime artists.

    How else do you think I got here?

    But after all, what do I know? I'm only a Japanime action figure, at best.

  • Anonym
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    "Pure chance"... but the odds were very much in our favor.

    I mean, if you drop a stone, the odds are pretty good it will fall to the ground.

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    when people are like man the chance of a substancial earth is like one in a billion well, its and infinite universe so it'd have to happen sometime

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    None of the above.

    Quelle(n): Chemistry is not random.
  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    we can only base this on the writtings in the scriptures and other writtings not in the bible.

    Based on that God with thought and voice created.

    Now that does not mean he did not follow some rules of science. and that the way the Science explains it is not the way He did it.

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    by stimulation to orgasm, resulting in release of sperm into the female

    Quelle(n): biology class
Haben Sie noch Fragen? Jetzt beantworten lassen.