Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.

Bored Again fragte in Social ScienceGender Studies · vor 1 Jahrzehnt

If it was available, how many men would take birth control?

I've heard stories over the years that one reason drug companies don't put the money into research for an effective male birth control is that men won't take it, that even though they don't want children they still want to know mentally that they are able to do so. Not entirely sure how true that assumption is, it's just something that I've read.

Now, it seems as a lot of the arguments about men having no say in regards to unplanned pregnancy could be avoided by this, i.e. a man wouldn't have to rely purely on condoms which can fail (or be sabotaged) or on their partners 'promises' to take birth control, or drunken accidents, or what have you. Just like women, men who wish to have sex but are not ready or do not want the responsibilities of parenthood can protect themselves.

The number of unwanted children would most likely drop as would the number of abortions and paternity fraud and men/women trapping their partners into a relationship with a baby.

Now what if I also told you that there IS a way for a man to become temporarily sterile but it involved basically soaking your scrotum in very very hot water repeatedly in order to damage them so that they would no longer produce sperm and that with the correct upkeep is not only effective but the damage will heal itself within a sort time giving a man back his full fertility if he stops the treatments.

I've read about a guy who did this (it's I believe an old Indian thing, but I'm not sure, it was a couple of years ago that I read it). It was just a grad student with a microscope but his research showed very good results (zero live sperm).

So men, would you either take a pill or boil your balls to protect yourself aginst the possiblity of being screwed over with a baby you don't want?

Honest question here, I truly believe that giving men the same options as to birth control as women would be a good thing, helping to level the playing field for both sides.

Update:

I never said that a pill would be simple, but neigher are a lot of things they now have cures for, once the research is funded. Besides, you don't have to kill the sperm, you just have to find a way to stop the production. Just like with the hot water method, it's been known for decades that heat kills sperm, it's not a sercert.

Just as it may take one sperm, it only takes one egg too.

Update 2:

If I remeber sex ed correctly, condoms are only 80% effective (it's bee a while so I may be off). As for sperm dying from heat, that's exactly why it works, the heat kills the sperm but doesn't do enough damage to be permament, and since the body needs time to regenerate a supply of sperm, there you go.

As a man you don't want to boil your balls (frankly I don't really blame you) BUT you also want more responsiblity from women regarding cycles and birth control, it's a drug, and can have some pretty serious side effects (blot clots can kill you or make you a veggie). I'm just saying if a man doesn't want kids he take a little more of a risk then a rubber covering some of the sensations of sex just like a woman does.

And actually, you're talking to an 'accident' baby (a birth control accident and yes, she was taking it correctly).

12 Antworten

Relevanz
  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt
    Beste Antwort

    Eoghan--There's no such thing as an accidental pregnancy in the West? Do you REALLY believe this? Try telling that, then, to my best friend's step mom, who got pregnant at *48*, and did NOT want more children, especially since her youngest had developmental problems. She was devastated, but had the child anyway because of religious views. she was on the pill. It failed.

    Also try telling that to my husband's 17 yr old (at the time) niece. she was off to college, and would have had an abortion if her mother had not talked her out of it, ALSO due to religious reasons. She was also on the pill, it failed.

    Accidental pregnancies most certainly happen. birth control is not 100% effective...it's a simple matter of MATH that there WILL be some accidental pregnancies, and not all women have the practical option of abortion, because of religious beliefs.

    Responsibility is a two way street. Women are responsible for protecting themselves, and men are responsible for their own protection. If a man or woman leaves that responsibility SOLELY in the hands of someone else, they get what they deserve....namely, an unwanted pregnancy.

    If I were not married, and dating a man on birth control, i would STILL provide my own. It's common sense, people.

  • Offkey
    Lv 7
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    I don't think the water technique is really effective. I would be afraid it would be permanent as well (the reason the balls are outside is because sperm doesn't live at the 37.2 °C).

    I personally am not on the pill, because I don't want to take hormones. There are other ways, and I'm going to have an IUD. I don't think such a thing would exist for men, they'd probably need a hormonal thing.

    I'm curious to know the answers. That being said, you need to trust your partner, and I'm not sure many women would trust their partner enough. In any case, condoms would still be compulsory at the beginning of a relationship.

    Edit:

    As for condoms: I've tried a female condom once with my bf. It felt like I had a plastic bag in my vagina! And my bf said exactly the same! They might have involved, though. And condoms are not exactly great for women, either. You feel the plastic too!

  • Anonym
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    I've read up on the subject in the past, and from what I remember is that the FDA won't approve male birth control. All one has to do is give men testosterone and after about 6 weeks spermatogenesis will stop due to a negative feedback loop operating through the HTPA. Of course if you give a man too much testosterone for a long period of time that will make him permanently sterile. I would prefer an oil depot over oral steroids any day; they are way safer and the only oral steroid that isn't horribly hepatotoxic is testosterone undecanoate, and that isn't very bioavailable at that.

    I'm not going subject my testes to scalding water...that's just plain stupid.

    The gov't fears men, fears and vilifies testosterone, and doesn't want men to have even normal test. levels, let alone high levels.

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    Looking a little outside the box, the pill doesn't protect from STD's.

    Just sayin'..it should be a combined effort of pill+condom to avoid pregnancy, condom to protect from unwanted diseases.

  • Wie finden Sie die Antworten? Melden Sie sich an, um über die Antwort abzustimmen.
  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    Hasn't unwanted pregnancies been part of the rationalization for shots, pills, and abortion? I don't think any medical breakthroughs are going to prevent people from being irresponsible. I wouldn't support anything where a person is harming themselves just to reduce their chances of getting pregnant.

  • Anonym
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    I think it would be the best thing since sliced bread (if not too expensive).

    Any man with an abundance of sexual partners and a fear of commitment or unplanned child birth would jump at the opportunity to take male birth control.

    OBVIOUSLY

    Quelle(n): Mike T has spoken
  • Anonym
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    You have been misinformed.

    The reason for there not being a male birth control is simple.

    Women have 1 ova , men have millions of sperm and it only takes 1 survivor.

    Yes , I would use a pill if it were reasonably safe and very effective.

    Quelle(n): Oh Yes , Why in God's name would I boil my testicles when I could just use a condom ?
  • Anonym
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    Yes, I think it would be a brilliant idea to have that as an option.

  • Anonym
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    No

    Not till it was fully tested, on other guys.

    Genuine accidental pregnancies are very rare and theres no such thing as an accidental birth in the west.

    Women have been given numerous b/c options and its easy to follow a cycle, if anything we should be asking women to be more responsible.

    You will find the countries the give the best benefits for single mother also have the highest "accidental" pregnancy rate.

    Guys can have rules for themselves, nothing comes inside there.

    It beggars belief that so many women will want unprotected sex and have no clue when they are fertile.

    Wendy, I said a genuine accidental pregnancy is rare, condoms do burst and the pill isnt fail safe but the rest are from throwing the dice and / or arent really accidents. So dont be getting your knickers in a twist.

  • Anonym
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    Pills are for women, if they don't want to take them, I'll give them to my cat.

    Condoms were made for men. Those who want to wear them, that is.

Haben Sie noch Fragen? Jetzt beantworten lassen.