Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.

What are the claims made Creationism?

I am writing a paper analyzing creationism and evolution in the context of their validity as scientific theories, but I'm not entirely sure how to summarize the theory of creationism. According to the theory, which of the following does it claim / grant:

Different species exist today.

All species that exist today were created by a supreme being at some point in the past.

All species that the supreme being created were created at the same time.

Creatures reproduce to propagate the species, but do not diverge to form other species.

All species that were created initially still exist today.

Please let me know which of these are actually claimed by creationism, and any others that I may have missed.

Update:

Serious answers only please - preferably from people who actually subscribe to creationism.

8 Antworten

Relevanz
  • MK6
    Lv 7
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt
    Beste Antwort

    Creationism is limited to the idea that there was a super-natural creator of life.

    Even some 'creationists' can have faith that evolution 'completed' what the creator started.

    But this creationist has confidence that each animal re-produces after it's own "kind", that species are dying off, and that sin created 'death' and defects in all of creation, - including the universe.

    The so-called appearance of species in archeological strata can be for one of a few reasons:

    1. aliens dumped their bio-trash here.

    2. critters evolved.

    3. there was insufficient numbers of a species before-hand, - to make a fossil.

    3b. Land lost to plate tectonics means some 'earth' will never be found.

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    Okay first of all there is no validity in creationism at all. And I think if you try to write this paper maybe you should buckle down on a specific kind of religion. Because when you mention creationism you'll have like 100,000+ religion that claims it. Evolution has NOTHING to do with creationism btw. Evolution just simply states how we humans/animals etc evovled while creationism states how everything the earth plants etc are made. You need to look into abiogensis more for that. If your trying to compare Creationism maybe you should try studying the big bang and then come with your own conclusion what was before the big bang(most people like richard darkiwns?<--- forgot how to spell his name) claims that everything before the big bang doesn't matter since the big bang is the beginning point of time. But that's all up for interpretation. good luck hope i made sense o__o;

  • db606
    Lv 4
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    Creationism is more of a story, or rather, a belief based on the literal interpretation of a 3500ish year old story.

    That or modern science? Should make for a great conclusion.

  • Anonym
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    HA!

    biblical creationism would include all of them

    execpt the last, that convenitently deals with the whole "dinosaur issue" and the "flood" and all

    though none of them have any scientific validity

  • Wie finden Sie die Antworten? Melden Sie sich an, um über die Antwort abzustimmen.
  • neil s
    Lv 7
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    A scientific theory must make specific predictions, and therefore it must be falsifiable. Creationism, by positing an all-powerful creator as it's "mechanism", predicts literally *anything*, which means it cannot be falsified, and is not science.

  • Anonym
    vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    The stars were created after the earth is one of the claims. If that were true most of their light would not have reached us yet and we woudl not be able to see them.

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    The majority of their papers are copy and pasted from the bibles and the rest is speculation.

  • vor 1 Jahrzehnt

    creationists claim mumbo jumbo is valid over scientific thought

Haben Sie noch Fragen? Jetzt beantworten lassen.