Want to have a passive revolution?

I'm a pacisist anarchist? We can have a pacifist revolution. You may know the name of a pacifist-anarchist, he called himself an anarcho-pacifist, his name was Leo Tolstoy, author of War and Peace. Pacifism or non-compliance is the best weapon against the state, they know who to respond to guns and bombs, can do it effectively, without bad PR, not so with passive non-compliance. People like to for instance, smoke marijuana (this is not about drugs or any particulate legal issue) , which hurt no one, and if it does it only hurts the smoker/user. What if people smoked/used marijuana without care for the consequences, went to jail or paid the ticket or not. Or people don't want to pay taxes because they want to keep their money and/or they don't want to support the things that taxes support, and as for services like to the poor or needy causes they can be more effectively supported without taxes, people are most generous in giving to charity voluntarily. So they don't pay taxes. They go to jail and soon the jails fill up with marijuana smokers and tax evaders. This can only go on for so long. With everyone not complying with laws they don't like, the power of the state will be neutralized. There will be nothing they can do about it. Soon, the state will collapse or e so powerless that in effect, it won't exist. Sure, some people will vote on election day, but that will just be a formality. The government will not exist anymore than borders. The government will collapse without a shot.

Note: I did ask this before but miscategorised it. Got 2 answers.

I might also add the realization that we cannot afford governmet. Checkout www.iousa.com

Considering US debt, the US is the poorest and largest 3rd world country in the world, US wealth is artificial. It's like if I'm a millionaire, but its all on credit. My net worth is a million dollars, but I owe $50 million to the credit companies.

The economic problems of the world are cause by large countries such as the US, UK, China, etc. If we had a thousand to a million countries and "governments" the economic problems would not exists We have the US$, and all the other dollar currencies,the GB pound, and the Euro. They are each controlled and manipulated by the central banks and the federal reserve. If in the US were 49 different currencies, the demographics would be different, and depressions and recessions wouldn't be so widespread.

Everything after "note" is additional to the original question.