If it's true that since a fetus isn't viable outside of the womb we should be able to kill infants also?

Don't fall to Give Me Liberty's ignorant and dangerous rhetoric. the Pro Life movement isn't "absurd"; it's moral. Give Me Liberty's argument in his blog is that another newborn baby into this World adds to the food and money shortage and therefore causes increased death. Therefore women should rip their baby's body apart at will. This argument not only an immoral position that promotes murder, but is exemplifies the absurdedness that he accuses the pro life movement of having. Plus, it is a white flag position; for he is advocating a position of not even attempting to find a way for EVERYONE to live. There are charities such as ABC Ministry http://www.abcministry.org.za/Vision.htm , and SOS Children's Villages http://www.soschildrensvillages.org.uk/c... that help unwanted babies in third world countries and help them to find loving homes. As well as Lifecall http://www.lifecall.org/shelters.html who do the same within the United States. All these charities need is more funding/donations and they can save more lives. Then more people born into the World won't further impact the lives of the living.

And yes, you present a great argument. Most people thought it was terrible when that lady drowned her kids in the bathtub; yet some of those same people favor abortions. Hypocrites. A life is a life; and an embryo is a life.

And for the record NO ONE is totally dependent. EVERYONE needs another human being for some sort of way of sustaining their life. Unless you grow your own food, hunt your own animals, and irrigate your own water you're a hypocrite.

Lets just take a look at what you suggest. What is the cost to society if we take a fetus out of the womb and sustain it in an artificial environment? I would guess that the nine months from conception to birth would be several million dollars.

How many other lives could be saved for the same money? What your little idea does is illustrate the complete absurdity of the pro life movement. The money you spend saving a fetus will always be more than the money it costs to save a child that is already born. When you waste money you waste lives. It is impossible to save a fetus without killing a child. http://www.prolifeismurder.com/

And to further complicate your proposal, it is impossible to have sex without consenting to abortion. http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-2TjBrmQlabMmkPXFrSm...

God has set up the Universe in such a way that You as a pro lifer must choose abortion in order to procreate. You really have a problem.

It is entirely possible that a baby COULD survive on its own, it knows how to suckle; all it needs is to find a source of nourishment and an environment that would not create hypothermia of heat stroke.

There are plenty of conditions needed for survival. I put it to you if you were locked in a room with no access to food or water, you would not survive long, or if you were without shelter in inhospitable temperatures...

Every creature needs at the very least a hospitable environment, and resources to sustenance.

The fetus is fed by the connection to its mothers womb. Infants are by nature fed from that same mothers breasts. Therefore, we should not be killing the so called fetus. God said in His Holy Word that the "fruit of the womb" was alive....not a fetus and not dead. Before John the Apostle was born he leaped in his mothers womb when he heard to word of God. No too much like dead was he? Ask any mother to be..they feel the baby move, so it is not dead or just a blob or whatever else people wish to refer to it as.

Pro-choice is a phrase used today to make way for young ladies to get rid of the price of a sinful night out on the town. Not so in God's Word. You committed murder.

The only safe sex that really works is "one aspirin held tightly between the knees"

God forgives the one that is raped and so on but I don't think He condones abortion in any circumstance.

There's a difference between something NEEDING to be inside someone to survive, and something needing care.

By your logic, we can also deliver 1 week old bunch of cells and they'd survive and grow perfectly well, because 'only the environment has changed'.

Of course, you're wrong. Not only has the environment changed, the bunch of cells has become a functional human being that can breathe AIR and eat through it's damn mouth.

Then again, this is the R&S section, and the Bible does say that God only considers a human life one month AFTER birth..

If I am getting up in the morning, checking on a worm in a cage, and giving it food that it eats with its mouth, with my hands.. then it is my pet worm. If the worm is inside me eating the food I eat from inside me, taking my blood supply, and would die if it were OUTSIDE me, then it is a parasite.

We can't take a fetus out of a womb and stick it in somebody else's body if the mother doesn't want it. A baby, on the other hand, can be taken care of by just about anybody.

Let us look at what God's word has to say about babies. The following scripture is God speaking to Jeremiah.

Jeremiah 1:5 "Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations."

If God knew Jeremiah before he came out of womb, is it reasonable to assume that God knows each of us before we come out of the womb.

With the different birth control methods on the market today, there is no reason why a woman/man can not avail themselves to use one of these methods. God instituted marriage in the garden of Eden. If people would adhere to God's teachings, the we would have no unwanted babies. Unfortunately, many today have premarital sex, and end up getting pregnant. A baby, should not pay with his life, because a man and/or a woman is too lazy to use some form of birth control.

A fetus cannot pump its own blood, use its own lungs, or even think with its own brain. A fetus is, for all intents and purposes, nothing more than a tumor.

An infant can do all of those things that a fetus cannot.

A baby cant breathe on its own and wont survive if left laying there for two hours by itself?? WOW!!! Who knew??????

Yeah, Id like to see you do that with a fetus. Go on - show us that a fetus can live two hours outside the womb by itself.

See where your argument failed?

*The Roadhorse is appalled at the large numbers of Christian Pro-Life women that stand in line outside abortion clinics to receive those unwanted embryos and have them implanted in themselves to act as surrogate mothers so that they can care for them once they are born*

POP!!!!!!

*The Roadhorse wakes up*