Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.
Do you think America should move away from personal fireworks for 4th of July in favor of safer practices?
It is obvious that fireworks pose many dangers, particularly when carelessly used and abused. Would you be in favor of discontinuing the "traditional" practices for safer light, visual and decorative displays as has been adopted for Christmas and Halloween?
In the era of technological advances, miniaturization, and ecological awareness, there could be many novel ways to celebrate "patriotism" (term used loosely) in an entertaining fashion on both a personal level and in public extravaganzas.
Would banning personal fireworks be acceptable to you on a National level, and would you show the initiative to boycott explosive and polluting displays to make it a safer and saner holiday?
Geez! The anarchists and "freedom means I can do anything I want" folks are having a field day!
This servey is to see how ameanable the public might be to a creative endeavor that I want to initiate. It allows those that want a more interactive way to make their own displays creative and exciting. It is more than: light the fuse, step back, and hope for the best.
Yes! it will be safe enough that small children can join in the fun (with less supervision); it will not burn down other people's homes or set off wildfires; Yes! it will not cause as much litter, noise or air pollution as the "traditional explosives", (though there are explosive elements involved). These are benefits that shouldn't be ignored.
It could be a "variety package" much like Christmas lights and decorations are stored and changed each year.
This is not about outlawing fireworks, it's about a modern option that makes our displays "friendlier" on many levels.
I will revise the question.
5 Antworten
- Big DawgLv 4vor 1 JahrzehntBeste Antwort
I do; I'd be in favor of such a proposal. I hate it when tragedies occur during holidays. And I think I'm turning green.
- vor 1 Jahrzehnt
First, I don't think this is a "Right" or "Wrong" answer... it is a matter of to what degree and what perspective you approach the subject. It is not unlike Gun control: are you willing to give up some rights for public safety. Drug legalization, very similar question. There are benefits and risks, once you recognize both, it is no longer a clear right or wrong, but more a matter of personal opinion.
in this particular case:
NO, I would not support this. I recognize that there is a safety factor, (I'm a Firefighter/Paramedic, I see the results all the time), and to be honest, I don't personally use fireworks. But I do believe in the individual rights of each person, that includes the right to hurt yourself. The real question here concerns hurting others and children hurting themselfs. Again, I further accknowledge that anyone who choose safety over rights for these reason are coorect, but I don't think in this case, the benifits outweight rights.
I know this isn't P.C. to say, but there is a limit to the cost of saving a life. I'm quite sure I could come up with a set of a thousant or so laws enforceable by death without trial that would save a lot of lives, but when you are force to sit in an empty padded room and only allowed to eat a healthy powder suppliment, you may recogonise, that there is a limit. While taking away fireworks is certainly not even close to such an extreme, I present it to illustrate that all safety issues or saving a life somehow outweight all other things. Do I think all people should have the right to set off a nuclear weapon? no. Do i think we should not allow people to wear cloths so they can't hide the butter knives that are outlawed? no. but somewhere in the middle of those two extremes, lays a middleground with a lot of space to either side. I just personnaly lean to the side of personal rights over limiting personal stupidity (sorry for the lack of a better way to put that).
I don't do drugs or drink alcohol, but I support the legalization of drugs and right of an individual to kill themself anyway they choose. I support Gun ownership, with reasonable limitations. and i support the right of individuals who what to blow their hands off or burn down their house with fireworks.
But then again, I know I won't be letting my son touch fireworks, even if i have to take away his right to do so.
- JayLv 5vor 1 Jahrzehnt
If humankind had always been as risk-averse as the current crop of nanny state 'Not On Planet Earth' (NOPE) control freaks, we'd have starved off and/or frozen to death in the Neanderthal age, because we couldn't have been allowed to leave the cave to hunt (big, scary animals) or light a fire (might get burned)...
Sheesh.
By this logic cars should have been banned long ago as they injure more people and cause far more pollution. Even with helmet laws far more people are injured every year on bikes than by fireworks.
- Diane BLv 6vor 1 Jahrzehnt
No I don't think we have to ban personal fireworks. If they are exploded in a responsible manner, no one should get hurt. I know there are several states in the US that don't allow them at all.
Here in Tasmania Australia you have to get a permit to buy and set off personal fireworks. That is good because you have to be over a certain age, and that keeps them out of the hands of juveniles and others who could potential hurt people or animals.
- Wie finden Sie die Antworten? Melden Sie sich an, um über die Antwort abzustimmen.
- Anonymvor 1 Jahrzehnt
Yes I do.....and I think we shoudl move away from leavign the hosue becasue that increases our chances of being hit the car......we should also move awy from staying In hte house becuase this increases our chances of being caught in a house fire