I was wondering.....If a turtle had no shell..would he be considered naked or homeless??

Very Very good Joke . Never heared that one before. Thanks for the laugh.

P.s. It would be DEAD. A turtle can't live without the shell

If a turtle loses its shell it incredibly is seen ineffective. in case you seem interior an empty turtle shell, you will see its backbone is hooked as much as the precise. no longer many stuff can stay and not making use of a backbone. Hehe!! ;-) of path in case you're conversing some comic strip turtle or something, i might evaluate it to be extra bare than homeless. asserting a turtle "lives" in its shell is like asserting a human "lives" in its epidermis. type of actual, even though it extra precise to declare a human lives in a house. basically like a turtle lives in a lake (Or the woods, or the sea. relies upon on the species)

Well maybe both because it would have no shell there it is naked and have no shell (house) which would make it naked and homeless. there you go!

hey I like that question.. its funny.. maybe it would be considered naked and homeless

Yes he would be naked,homeless and wrinkled ....Good observation......

why not both? and let's just add ugly to boot -- since we're being specific!

both

both lol

BOTH !

no it would be dead!