Yahoo Clever wird am 4. Mai 2021 (Eastern Time, Zeitzone US-Ostküste) eingestellt. Ab dem 20. April 2021 (Eastern Time) ist die Website von Yahoo Clever nur noch im reinen Lesemodus verfügbar. Andere Yahoo Produkte oder Dienste oder Ihr Yahoo Account sind von diesen Änderungen nicht betroffen. Auf dieser Hilfeseite finden Sie weitere Informationen zur Einstellung von Yahoo Clever und dazu, wie Sie Ihre Daten herunterladen.
How do you calculate the square root of a number, without using a calculator.?
For example what is the square root of 41. Yes!! a calculator will do it, but I want to know how it is done by mechanical means on paper.
15 Antworten
- vor 1 JahrzehntBeste Antwort
Trial and error:
1) 41 is between 36 (6 squared) and 49 (7 squared) so its square root is between 6 and 7.
2) try 6.5 x 6.5 = 42.25. Root of 41 must be just under 6.5
3) try 6.4 x 6.4 = 40.96. Root of 41 is just a tiny bit above 6.4.
4) try 6.41 x 6.41 = 41.0881. Root of 41 is a very tiny bit below 6.41.
5) try 6.405 x 6.405
etc
- Anonymvor 1 Jahrzehnt
The method seems long, but is easy when you get used to it.
Example square root of 6,558,721
Divide the number up in bits of two starting from the right so we then have
6,55,87,21
Take the first bit on the left, in this case 6 and find the highest square of a number that will go into 6. Even if this was a double number it could not be higher than 99 so the highest square you have to consider is 9 squared = 81
answer 2...........2 squared is 4
Show as follows, take the 4 from the 6 = 2, bring down the next pair and also write the 2 on the top.
.......2
2.....6, 55, 87, 21
......4
.......255
Double the 2, gives us 4. But think of it as 40 something.
......2
2.....6, 55, 87, 21
......4
4*....255
Now find the largest number that can replace the * with the full number being multiplied by * with the answer being less than 255
43 times 3 = 129
44 times 4 = 176
45 times 5 = 225
46 times 6 = 276
So it is 5. Make the 4* into 45 and also put the 5 up on the top
.......2 5
2.....6, 55, 87, 21
......4
45....255
.......225
......... 3087
As above, deduct 225 from 255 and then bring down the next pair of numbers
Now we have 25 on the top line. Double it makes 50. Add a * as before to give 50*
So now we have a number of 500 and something up to 509.
Do the same as before 501 times 1, 502 time 2 etc
Looks like maybe 506 times 6
That equals 3036. Looks good. 507 times 7 would be 3549, too big.
We now have
.......2 5 6 With that new 6 added to the top line
2.....6, 55, 87, 21
.....4
45....255
.......225
506....3087
........ 3036
We now do the sum of 3087 minus 3036 and bring down the next pair.
......2 5 6
2.....6, 55, 87, 21
.......4
45...255
......225
506....3087
.........3036
.............5121
On the top line we now have 256. Double it and use it as before with the * at the end
.......2 5 6
2......6, 55, 87, 21
........4
45.....255
.........225
506......3087
...........3036
512*.........5121
This one looks easy 5021 times 1 = 5021. So put in the 1. We now have
.......2 5 6 1 With that 1 added to the top line
2..... 6, 55, 87, 21
........4
45 .....255
.........225
506.......3087
.............3036
5121.........5121
.................5121
0
At the top we have 2561. Try your calculator. We have the correct answer.
I used as an example a number that would give a whole number answer. If the answer was not a whole number, you could just keep going after the decimal point as far as you want.
The last time I had to do this must have been about 50 years ago. It is surprising what one can remember.
Please excuse all the ..........
Seems Yahoo does not like leading spaces. Plus I tried to put underlines in the relevant places and that did not work.
- vor 1 Jahrzehnt
I forgot but I think this is how it goes.
one example would be sq root of 8.
You start off by finding a number that you can divid the number 8 by. This number has to give you one number that can be perfect square and another number that you can't. Though if you get two perfect square I think, you have to do it again.
so 8 would be 2 and 4. 2 can't be perfect squared while 4 can.
so sq root of 8 is 2sqroot of 2 which equals sq root of 8.
check it on a calculator.
now for 41 well thats a hard one since there are no numbers that you divide into 41 can be perfect squared. Other than that, yea trail and error works best for 41.
I hope this helps.
- wandera1970Lv 6vor 1 Jahrzehnt
Yes you can calculate the Square Root of anumber with out using a calculator.
The ancient Babylonians had a nice method of computing square roots
that can be applied using only simple arithmetic operations. To find
a rational approximation for the square root of an integer N, let k
be any number such that k^2 is less than N. Then k is slightly less
than the square root of N, and so N/k is slightly greater than the
square root of N. It follows that the average of these two numbers
gives an even closer estermate.
. . . . . . . . . k+N/k
new_k = -----------
. . . . . . . . . 2
See link to Acient Square Roots
Quelle(n): http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath190.htm - Wie finden Sie die Antworten? Melden Sie sich an, um über die Antwort abzustimmen.
- Anonymvor 1 Jahrzehnt
Obviously mathmaticians way back when had to figure out a way to do it but I've asked several of my math teachers the same thing and they said there is no way to do it. Once again, there HAS to be a way to do it but I'm sure that it involves a complicated formula or a good deal of division that no normal person in there right mind would care to do. It's really not needed anyways since the majority of teachers will let you use a calculator on tests that require the square root of a number to be found
- vor 1 Jahrzehnt
I was at school when calculators just came out, so we were brought up on slide rules and 4-figure tables.
In those days we used logarithms to work out squares and roots.
To work out the square root of 41, look up the logarithm (base 10 will be OK), this gives 1.612. i.e 10 to the power 1.612 is 41.
To find the square root just halve the index, so half of 1.612 is 0.806.
So the square root of 41 is 10 to the power 0.806.
Back to those 4 figure log tables to look up the inverse log and the answer is 6.397. Compared to the calculator answer of 6.403 it is 0.006 out, but thats the modern luxury of 8 decimal places on a calculator.
There is also a way of working it out on a slide rule, but mine went years ago and I can't quite remember how to do it.
Quelle(n): Being old!!! - vor 1 Jahrzehnt
It's done best by way of diagrams using circles and triangles (which are half a square) that are drawn to scale and can be measured accurately.
But if you want to get complicated, you can throw in Pythagoras' theorem for the length of a hypoteneuse when the other two sides are of equal length - but don't forget to draw the cricle which has that hypoteneuse as a tangent and the point of right-angle as the centre of the circle.
Then it's easy....and you can work out areas, value of pi, logs, exponential functions....wooohoooooo.
- Anonymvor 1 Jahrzehnt
There is a way to extract a square root similar to doing a long devision. I can't remember how to do it now. But here is the link for it.