Bouan Philippe

But the most opportune moment might be in the next half hour instead of the next five minutes, although you have already decided to finish the conversation.

Diplomacy requires the most tactful appearance, which does not always reflect what you think.

True or false?

But the most opportune moment might be in the next half hour instead of the next five minutes, although you have already decided to end it.

Diplomacy requires the most tactful appearance, which does not always reflect what you are thinking.

True or false?

Despite saying that they would like to exchange photos they have suddenly withdrawn from the conversation after having seen your recent photograph.

What are the possible reasons?

In addition to the aforementioned, its military organisation has suffered a systemic total collapse due to its chaotic organisation and overwhelming distrust among the recruits.

But it is simply DISHONEST counter espionage DISINFORMATION to pretend that this is not REAL.

For the actual purpose of counter espionage itself is to dissuade and discourage the enemy by the spread of DISINFORMATION.

True or false?

In addition to the aforementioned, its military organisation has suffered a systemic total collapse due to its chaotic organisation and overwhelming distrust among the recruits.

But it is simply DISHONEST counter espionage DISINFORMATION to pretend that this is not REAL.

For the actual purpose of counter espionage itself is to dissuade and discourage the enemy by the spread of DISINFORMATION.

True or false?

In addition to the aforementioned, its military organisation has suffered a systemic total collapse due to its chaotic organisation and overwhelming distrust among the recruits.

But it is simply DISHONEST counter espionage DISINFORMATION to pretend that this is not REAL.

For the actual purpose of counter espionage itself is to dissuade and discourage the enemy by the spread of DISINFORMATION.

True or false?

Isaiah 63

1 ‘Who is this that comes from Edom, from Bozrah in garments stained crimson? Who is this so splendidly robed, marching in his great might?’‘It is I, announcing vindication, mighty to save.’2 ‘Why are your robes red, and your garments like theirs who tread the wine press?’3 ‘I have trodden the wine press alone, and from the peoples no one was with me; I trod them in my anger and trampled them in my wrath; their juice spattered on my garments,and stained all my robes.

4 For the day of vengeance was in my heart, and the year for my redeeming work had come.

5 I looked, but there was no helper; I stared, but there was no one to sustain me;so my own arm brought me victory,    and my wrath sustained me.

6 I trampled down peoples in my anger, so I crushed them in my wrath, AND I POURED OUT THEIR LIFEBLOOD ON THE EARTH.'   

The above Scripture (bold type) is concerned about violence and bloodshed. Isaiah 63:6

True or false?

Neither country seemed to like each other due to the ideological and political differences between capitalism and communism, except that they had a common enemy in the Axis Powers.

Roosevelt and Stalin represented a disparate alliance of disparate nations due to the conflict between capitalism and communism.

True or false?

Strangers are supposedly a "protected class" according to Exodus 22, but they are not "universally protected" at all because it is okay to kill a stranger, or to kill as many as possible in a legitimate war situation, whereby the ENEMY are clearly STRANGERS.

As attested by Israel's destruction and genocide of foreigners in the Old Testament (Deuteronomy 20:16-17).

True or false?

True or false?

The Christian Bible does not recognize the so called "protected categories" listed under the secular law, such as the disabled, children and pregnant women, etc.

Because the New Testament is primarily concerned about the doctrine that "there is no Jew or Greek, male or female, slave or free" (Galatians 3:28) and the idea that "there are no innocent people at all" (Romans 3:10, 23, Ecclesiastes 7:20) under the new covenant.

Which means that God has the right to treat everybody the same, and thereby condemn everyone on a "no holds barred basis" (Ezekiel 18:4, Romans 6:23), based on the reality of their sins instead of their putative membership (or non-membership) of a "protected class".

Ultimately, it means that God has the right to Judge or condemn anyone, regardless of their alleged disability, age or pregnant status, etc.

But of course, the religious law of the Bible has always been juxtaposed against the secular laws, norms and values of this country, which implies that there is potential conflict and tension between the different sets of rules.

Nevertheless, God's Will and His Holy Judgment must ultimately prevail (Daniel 4:35, Isaiah 55:11, Matthew 25:41, 46), regardless of the juxtaposition and the existence of secular laws, norms and values.

True or false?

Why do they employ people who are racially inferior to work for this organisation?

Because they have hired racially inferior people who are working as double agents for the UK and its Third world counterparts.

Consequently, such a treachery is encouraged by the UK Military Intelligence because they have hired people who have divided loyalties who have no right to live, but should be deported to the Third world.

True or false?

Are all detainees required to remove their shoe laces, footwear and trouser belts?

Are personal belongings such as your wallet and cellphone confiscated whilst you are detained?

Does the aforementioned apply across the EU, or does it simply reflect the "internal politics" of certain countries within the EU?

Matthew 25

41 “Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed, into the

EVERLASTING FIRE prepared for the devil and his angels: 42 FOR I WAS HUNGRY AND YOU GAVE ME NO FOOD; I WAS THIRSTY AND YOU GAVE ME NO DRINK; 43 I WAS A STRANGER AND YOU DID NOT TAKE ME IN, NAKED AND YOU DID NOT CLOTHE ME, SICK AND IN PRISON AND YOU DID NOT VISIT ME.'44 “Then they also will answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?’ 45 Then He will answer them, saying, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ 46 And these will go away into EVERLASTING PUNISHMENT, but the righteous into eternal life.”

Some have argued that, "There is only finite punishment for finite sin", which is refuted by the Canonical Gospel of Matthew, chapter 25.

Accordingly, the bold script in verse 42 and verse 43 are but a few examples of "finite sins", which will be punished by "Everlasting hell" in verse 41 and verse 46.

That "finite sins" will be punished by "Eternal hell" is indisputable according to the actual meaning of Matthew 25.

Matthew 25

41 “Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed, into the EVERLASTING FIRE prepared for the devil and his angels: 42 for I was hungry and you gave Me no food; I was thirsty and you gave Me no drink; 43 I was a stranger and you did not take Me in, naked and you did not clothe Me, sick and in prison and you did not visit Me.’ 44 “Then they also will answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?’ 45 Then He will answer them, saying, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ 46 And these will go away into EVERLASTING PUNISHMENT, but the righteous into eternal life.”

Revelation 20:10 The devil, who deceived them, was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone where the beast and the false prophet are. AND THEY WILL BE TORMENTED DAY AND NIGHT FOREVER AND EVER.

The above Scripture (bold type) is loud and clear and IRREFUTABLE.

That "Hell is everlasting", but Revelation 20:12-14 does nothing at all to contradict the idea that "Hell is everlasting".

Because the Bible cannot possibly contradict itself, and there is nothing at all in Revelation 20:12-14 to say that "Hell is only temporary".

Jesus will use his powers to publicly humiliate President Xi Jinping, but what are you going to do about it?