blindmessiah

CAUTION : - This is just a question I'm asking out of my curiosity. But if a person indulges in any form of paranormal activities he / she would be doing on their own risk.

If Scientists and Atheists are so confident about science and their non-belief on God / Devil then why are they not giving evidences?

Why are they not seating in front of an Ouija Board. If they do so, then it would prove something : - 1) Either it will prove that they are right and things like God / Devil etc... do not exist.

2) If they experience something weird it would change their beliefs.

Richard Dawkins should play with Ouija Board shouldn't he?

For example : - Our Body is made up of billions of cells.

Each of the cell in our body provides us with energy, hereditary characters, etc... other functions as per their location.

Old cells die...new cells grow and keep our body working.

But with time...we age (if we reach old-age) and the number of growth of new cells becomes less, compared to the death of old cells, and eventually we die.

So I was wondering whether Universe might be working in a similar manner. I'm imagining Universe as a big-cosmic-organism,

And every of it's object like Galaxies, Stars, Planets (even us because we are inside a planet) , Asteroids etc...are providing Universe with a certain amount of Energy.

But as we know, in Universe also old Galaxies / Stars destruct and New Stars / Galaxies , Star-System rise from them.

Black Holes work as a control in the Universe, prohibiting over-population in the Universe (over-population of Cells in our Body means - Cancer)

And we also now know that Universe is also Ageing - Every of it's objects are going far and far away at a speed higher than expected (3 Physicists won Nobel Prize for this prediction)

So after Billions of years, Universe will have gone completely far away, more than it's limits, and it would freeze up and become non-existent,

Just like our body ages and it's cells reduces less and less in number.

So can it be? Does every object in the Universe contributes something to the overall existence of the Universe?

Or the Universe doesn't cares if there is 1 Billion or 1 Trillion of Earths?

For example : - Our Body is made up of billions of cells.

Each of the cell in our body provides us with energy, hereditary characters, etc... other functions as per their location.

Old cells die...new cells grow and keep our body working.

But with time...we age (if we reach old-age) and the number of growth of new cells becomes less, compared to the death of old cells, and eventually we die.

So I was wondering whether Universe might be working in a similar manner. I'm imagining Universe as a big-cosmic-organism,

And every of it's object like Galaxies, Stars, Planets (even us because we are inside a planet) , Asteroids etc...are providing Universe with a certain amount of Energy.

But as we know, in Universe also old Galaxies / Stars destruct and New Stars / Galaxies , Star-System rise from them.

Black Holes work as a control in the Universe, prohibiting over-population in the Universe (over-population of Cells in our Body means - Cancer)

And we also now know that Universe is also Ageing - Every of it's objects are going far and far away at a speed higher than expected (3 Physicists won Nobel Prize for this prediction)

So after Billions of years, Universe will have gone completely far away, more than it's limits, and it would freeze up and become non-existent,

Just like our body ages and it's cells reduces less and less in number.

So can it be? Does every object in the Universe contributes something to the overall existence of the Universe?

Or the Universe doesn't cares if there is 1 Billion or 1 Trillion of Earths?

For example : - Our Body is made up of billions of cells.

Each of the cell in our body provides us with energy, hereditary characters, etc... other functions as per their location.

Old cells die...new cells grow and keep our body working.

But with time...we age (if we reach old-age) and the number of growth of new cells becomes less, compared to the death of old cells, and eventually we die.

So I was wondering whether Universe might be working in a similar manner. I'm imagining Universe as a big-cosmic-organism,

And every of it's object like Galaxies, Stars, Planets (even us because we are inside a planet) , Asteroids etc...are providing Universe with a certain amount of Energy.

But as we know, in Universe also old Galaxies / Stars destruct and New Stars / Galaxies , Star-System rise from them.

Black Holes work as a control in the Universe, prohibiting over-population in the Universe (over-population of Cells in our Body means - Cancer)

And we also now know that Universe is also Ageing - Every of it's objects are going far and far away at a speed higher than expected (3 Physicists won Nobel Prize for this prediction)

So after Billions of years, Universe will have gone completely far away, more than it's limits, and it would freeze up and become non-existent,

Just like our body ages and it's cells reduces less and less in number.

So can it be? Does every object in the Universe contributes something to the overall existence of the Universe?

Or the Universe doesn't cares if there is 1 Billion or 1 Trillion of Earths?

For example : - Our Body is made up of billions of cells.

Each of the cell in our body provides us with energy, hereditary characters, etc... other functions as per their location.

Old cells die...new cells grow and keep our body working.

But with time...we age (if we reach old-age) and the number of growth of new cells becomes less, compared to the death of old cells, and eventually we die.

So I was wondering whether Universe might be working in a similar manner. I'm imagining Universe as a big-cosmic-organism,

And every of it's object like Galaxies, Stars, Planets (even us because we are inside a planet) , Asteroids etc...are providing Universe with a certain amount of Energy.

But as we know, in Universe also old Galaxies / Stars destruct and New Stars / Galaxies , Star-System rise from them.

Black Holes work as a control in the Universe, prohibiting over-population in the Universe (over-population of Cells in our Body means - Cancer)

And we also now know that Universe is also Ageing - Every of it's objects are going far and far away at a speed higher than expected (3 Physicists won Nobel Prize for this prediction)

So after Billions of years, Universe will have gone completely far away, more than it's limits, and it would freeze up and become non-existent,

Just like our body ages and it's cells reduces less and less in number.

So can it be? Does every object in the Universe contributes something to the overall existence of the Universe?

Or the Universe doesn't cares if there is 1 Billion or 1 Trillion of Earths?

I want to chat with someone in Filipino because I am a Language student

Steiap teman Indonesia yang tersedia?

Saya ingin belajar bahasa Indonesia

Jadi saya ingin chatiing dengan seseorang di Indonesia

Because I speak English

And I want to learn Thai Language

So anyone?

Sé Inglés mucho pero quiero aprender nuevos idiomas.

Me gustaría seguir aprendiendo algo.

Es por eso que me dije a aprender idiomas.

Y creo que es mejor hablar con alguien que leer libros.

Por favor, alguien habla conmigo en español y me dicen su dirección de e-mail?

Yo soy completamente honesto. Por lo tanto, también vosotros estad completamente honesto

Ich weiß, Englisch sehr viel, aber ich will neue Sprachen zu lernen.

Ich mag es, etwas zu lernen.

Deshalb habe ich verschiedene Sprachen lernen gedacht.

Und ich denke, es ist besser, mit jemandem als Bücher zu lesen unterhalten.

Bitte jemand mit mir chatten in Deutsch und sagen Sie mir Ihre E-mail?

Ich bin ganz ehrlich. Deshalb gibt es auch ganz ehrlich zu sein

So inglese molto molto, ma voglio imparare nuove lingue.

Mi piace continuare a imparare qualcosa.

Ecco perché ho pensato di imparare le lingue diverse.

E penso che sia meglio parlare con qualcuno che leggere libri.

Si prega di qualcuno chattare con me in italiano e dimmi il tuo indirizzo e-mail?

Sono completamente onesto. Cos�� anche voi essere completamente onesti

Je sais que beaucoup anglais, mais je veux apprendre de nouvelles langues.

Je tiens à continuer à apprendre quelque chose.

C'est pourquoi j'ai pensé à apprendre différentes langues.

Et je pense qu'il est préférable de discuter avec quelqu'un de lire des livres.

S'il vous plaît quelqu'un chatter avec moi en français et dites-moi votre e-mail?

Je suis tout à fait honnête. Donc, vous avez aussi être complètement honnête

We often say that a man or a woman who died are survived by their children.

But why do we say that?

No doubt those 2 children have the same genes as their ancestors,

But can ancestry be said to be the survival of an organism? For Example : -

A : - Is a Man

B : - Is a Woman

C : - Is a Daughter of A and B

D : - Is Son of A and B

Both ' C' and 'D' would posses the mixture of Genes from 'A' and 'B'.

But, after either 'A' and / OR 'B' dies, then how can we say that 'A' and /OR 'B' are survived by 'C' and 'D' , because 'C' and 'D' have same genes as 'A' and 'B'?

To me , 'Survival' means to exist. And to exist means to perceive 'consciousness', and to perceive all other things that define 'Life'.

So how can a person be said to survive by their Offspring, if he or she dies?

We often say that a man or a woman who died are survived by their children.

But why do we say that?

No doubt those 2 children have the same genes as their ancestors,

But can ancestry be said to be the survival of an organism? For Example : -

A : - Is a Man

B : - Is a Woman

C : - Is a Daughter of A and B

D : - Is Son of A and B

Both ' C' and 'D' would posses the mixture of Genes from 'A' and 'B'.

But, after either 'A' and / OR 'B' dies, then how can we say that 'A' and /OR 'B' are survived by 'C' and 'D' , because 'C' and 'D' have same genes as 'A' and 'B'?

To me , 'Survival' means to exist. And to exist means to perceive 'consciousness', and to perceive all other things that define 'Life'.

So how can a person be said to survive by their Offspring, if he or she dies?

Everyone struggle to achieve more and more in their life.

Everyone (most off...) want prestige and money.

The struggling-Life is not happy. Everyone struggles, but only few achieve their goals.

Now the happy life begins because more Money are achieved.

But I've observed that Rich people also are full of troubles. For example : -

'A Beggar struggles to make money to feed his Hunger' , 'While a typical Millionaire or a Billionaire struggles to remain mentally and physically fit and to lose weight, and get rid of Obesity'.

Diabetes, Hypertension and Obesity are Rich Peoples' favorite diseases.

Also, as the 'Money' increases, so does the responsibilities. And making more money requires one to be very busy (generally).

So Rich People also remained succumbed in their tensions. So how can Rich also be happy?

So if Not Rich, Not a Commoner, then...

Who is a Happy Person to You? How do you describe Happiness?

We differ in religion, nationality, ethnicity, social and professional status and more...

Many places of our World encourage unity of all class of people, while many places are very radical and isolate and prefer the development of their clan of people only.

So What I want to ask is would our World be more technologically advanced today, if we would have not been fighting over Religions, Resources, etc...

We differ in religion, nationality, ethnicity, social and professional status and more...

Many places of our World encourage unity of all class of people, while many places are very radical and isolate and prefer the development of their clan of people only.

So What I want to ask is would our World be more technologically advanced today, if we would have not been fighting over Religions, Resources, etc...

Is Human diversity a barrier for Technological advancement?

We differ in religion, nationality, ethnicity, social and professional status and more...

Many places of our World encourage unity of all class of people, while many places are very radical and isolate and prefer the development of their clan of people only.

So What I want to ask is would our World be more technologically advanced today, if we would have not been fighting over Religions, Resources, etc...

We differ in religion, nationality, ethnicity, social and professional status and more...

Many places of our World encourage unity of all class of people, while many places are very radical and isolate and prefer the development of their clan of people only.

So What I want to ask is would our World be more technologically advanced today, if we would have not been fighting over Religions, Resources, etc...

Our Universe is very big. So big that at present we can assume it's infinity.

I know most of it is covered with dark energy.

But then also the matter present in Universe is in huge scale.

Then also Why on Earth - It's Natural Resources are so much limited.

Now our History has shown that Empire were annihilated and raised because of competition due to natural resources.

It is in Human nature to compete and survive.

But wouldn't it be great if all the Natural Resources are unlimited?

So Why Universe is so much Infinite and yet all the natural resources so finite?